Player Watch #26: Cale Hooker - Back against Brisbane! - 11/4

CBombers17

Club Legend
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Posts
1,956
Likes
2,114
AFL Club
Essendon
It's a fair mark of just how far he's come that to ask whether he's the best player at the club is not at all a stretch.

Not saying he definitely is, by the way, but by jove he's in those calculations.
He's just such an unlikely/ungainly looking character its seems laughable really but the bottom line is he would have to be very, very close.

Saw him in a praccy up here in Canberra and they swung him forward and he looked quite good (nice goal etc).

Going through the list id say Jobe and Heppell are the only 2 that are actually better players - lots of movement to come though.

I was really happy for him when he turned down the West Coast trade and thrilled for him now. Deserves all his success big time.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Joined
Sep 2, 2008
Posts
46,972
Likes
26,053
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
The luxury of having a another gun fullback in Hurley to cover for Hooker while he plays forward makes me all giggedy :D Also I really hope Carlilse stays and gets put in his rightful spot when he returns.
 
Last edited:

Kakkle

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Posts
13,635
Likes
20,213
Location
Melbourne/Los Angeles
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Chicago Blackhawks, Crystal Palace
Further to my last post

Marks inside 50 per game pre Hooker forward = 9.6
Marks inside 50 per game post Hooker forward = 10.5

Not really that different is it...


That's because he has basically replaced Carlisle in the forward line. Hooker averages 3 marks I50 per game, Carlisle averages 2.
 

Bombers1234

All Australian
Joined
Jun 3, 2006
Posts
861
Likes
123
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Chelsea F.C, East Freo, Warriors
Interested to see your guys opinion on who will be the 3rd tall defender next year. Assuming that Fletcher retires and Hurley and Carlisle/Hooker take up the two defensive posts, who will be the third tall? Gwilt? Steinberg? Pears? Watching the Bulldogs game yesterday they only played with two tall backs (Talia and Morris), which gave them a lot of run off half back which could be an option. Looks most likely now we will structure up with Gwilt down back, which concerns me with his decision making at times.
 

yaco55

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Posts
35,436
Likes
11,847
Location
hong kong
AFL Club
Essendon
Interested to see your guys opinion on who will be the 3rd tall defender next year. Assuming that Fletcher retires and Hurley and Carlisle/Hooker take up the two defensive posts, who will be the third tall? Gwilt? Steinberg? Pears? Watching the Bulldogs game yesterday they only played with two tall backs (Talia and Morris), which gave them a lot of run off half back which could be an option. Looks most likely now we will structure up with Gwilt down back, which concerns me with his decision making at times.
Good pick up - Especially if you can get a Hibberd type to double up as third tall.
 

Mercurial89

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Posts
9,927
Likes
12,236
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Precisely my point though. For all this talk of how much better Hooker's doing, it's more or less the same result.
There might not be a stat to show it but it "feels" like hooker is winning or neutralising more contests than Jake. If the ball is on the ground he locks it in or he causes a loose ball.

This might just be my imagination however but thats where I think the improvement may be coming from. In addition to some of those younger players.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

duckdog

All Australian
Joined
May 17, 2010
Posts
686
Likes
428
Location
upper hiawatha
AFL Club
Essendon
The thing with Hooker is he fights for the ball if out of position. A fair few of his marks have been taken when the kick is not to his advantage.

If Carlisle is forward and if he doesn't have best position then the ball is pretty much gone.

Love watching this guy play.
The recession (injury) we had to have
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Posts
58,348
Likes
47,448
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
LFC, Demons, Melb City, Bears
There might not be a stat to show it but it "feels" like hooker is winning or neutralising more contests than Jake. If the ball is on the ground he locks it in or he causes a loose ball.

This might just be my imagination however but thats where I think the improvement may be coming from. In addition to some of those younger players.
Maybe. But I think his visible competitiveness is exaggerating the difference he's having.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Posts
58,348
Likes
47,448
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
LFC, Demons, Melb City, Bears
If people can't see that forward line is functioning better with Hooker there then there really isn't much help for them, forget stats and aall that mumbo jumbo we are playing better and are far more competitive than we were 6 weeks ago.
Nobody's arguing the forward line's better now than it has been. My point is I don't think as much of it is down to Hooker as people may think.
 

Mercurial89

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Apr 20, 2011
Posts
9,927
Likes
12,236
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
If people can't see that forward line is functioning better with Hooker there then there really isn't much help for them, forget stats and aall that mumbo jumbo we are playing better and are far more competitive than we were 6 weeks ago.
I don't think people are arguing that. the conversation at hand is-

- Is it because of Cale?
-Is it because the way our ball movement has changed?
-The other players that have been brought in?
- Possibly the teams we have played (less focused on defending the corridor against us)?

So while yes the forward line is functioning better, there are too many variables to know what this is down to (personally I believe its a bit of all of them). the debate then becomes, do we keep it as is, do we switch Carlisle back? or do we put him back forward when he returns.

In the end its a great convo to have and so much more entertaining and enjoyable then SAGA related stuff that has been all over this board for 3 years. This is a football debate. That's exciting :)
 

Halftimehero

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jun 26, 2012
Posts
9,599
Likes
7,945
Location
Front and Square
AFL Club
Essendon
Nobody's arguing the forward line's better now than it has been. My point is I don't think as much of it is down to Hooker as people may think.
I reckon you will find that it is though, Hooker compliments Daniher far better than Carlisle does, Jake and Joe are to similar, Hooker not only adds a bit of mongrel but he fights to keep the ball in better than anyone in the team, this in turn allows the other forwards to become more dangerous and create space for themselves and each other.

Have you maybe considered that the ball movement is better because Hooker is providing a far better option, I reckon the players further up field have more confidence to move the ball better and quicker knowing they have one of the best if not the best contested mark in the game up there.

So yes I put the major factor for our forward line functioning far more efficiently in recent weeks down to Hooker without a doubt.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Posts
58,348
Likes
47,448
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
LFC, Demons, Melb City, Bears
I reckon you will find that it is though, Hooker compliments Daniher far better than Carlisle does, Jake and Joe are to similar, Hooker not only adds a bit of mongrel but he fights to keep the ball in better than anyone in the team, this in turn allows the other forwards to become more dangerous and create space for themselves and each other.

Have you maybe considered that the ball movement is better because Hooker is providing a far better option, I reckon the players further up field have more confidence to move the ball better and quicker knowing they have one of the best if not the best contested mark in the game up there.

So yes I put the major factor for our forward line functioning far more efficiently in recent weeks down to Hooker without a doubt.
All fair. But the last few weeks we seem to have stopped playing half the team around the stoppage. Now when I look at our forward half there are players there to kick it to. That's a marked change on earlier in the season.
 

bombreys

Club Legend
Joined
May 8, 2015
Posts
1,516
Likes
977
AFL Club
Essendon
Has probably overtaken Heppell as our most important/valuable player this year.

Even though he's playing forward at the moment, I think Hooker/Hurley/Baguley is the best three man defensive rotation in the league.
 

daffo

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 28, 2007
Posts
7,071
Likes
1,722
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
What about comparing our average scores for and against with Hooker playing forward. Sure, he may be giving us a bit extra up forward but we are losing out a hell of a lot at the other end.

Hooker is a defender. He always will be. Needs to be played there.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Posts
58,348
Likes
47,448
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
LFC, Demons, Melb City, Bears
What about comparing our average scores for and against with Hooker playing forward. Sure, he may be giving us a bit extra up forward but we are losing out a hell of a lot at the other end.

Hooker is a defender. He always will be. Needs to be played there.
79.7 points per game against pre Round 14
111 points per game against post Round 14
 
Top Bottom