Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He’s kicking bloody goalsWHAT THE BLOODY HELL’S HE DOING THERE?!?
Yeah ziebell no way takes ridleys spotClearly picking the side off stats, only way to explain Ziebell.
Only one game.anyone else a bit worried about Chook? he's been good all year and structurally he's very important for us...but he was ordinary against the Pies - 0 goals, 3 free's against (mainly out of frustration), 1 mark, 2 tackles....hope he just had an off day and bounces back against the Blues this week. OR we could rest him and give Ambrose a go at full forward against the Blues...???
He didn’t stop trying and put enormous amount of pressure on. We scored so many opportunistic snap goals. The pressure he, Jones and stringer were applying, and at least being able to bring the ball to ground makes his off game still importantanyone else a bit worried about Chook? he's been good all year and structurally he's very important for us...but he was ordinary against the Pies - 0 goals, 3 free's against (mainly out of frustration), 1 mark, 2 tackles....hope he just had an off day and bounces back against the Blues this week. OR we could rest him and give Ambrose a go at full forward against the Blues...???
anyone else a bit worried about Chook? he's been good all year and structurally he's very important for us...but he was ordinary against the Pies - 0 goals, 3 free's against (mainly out of frustration), 1 mark, 2 tackles....hope he just had an off day and bounces back against the Blues this week. OR we could rest him and give Ambrose a go at full forward against the Blues...???
I thought he was fine. Took their main defender which allowed Wright to get better match-ups. Sure he didn't kick any goals, but that's more a bonus to what he already does by being in the forward 50.anyone else a bit worried about Chook? he's been good all year and structurally he's very important for us...but he was ordinary against the Pies - 0 goals, 3 free's against (mainly out of frustration), 1 mark, 2 tackles....hope he just had an off day and bounces back against the Blues this week. OR we could rest him and give Ambrose a go at full forward against the Blues...???
If he's fit, he playsDidn’t get amongst the goals, I might be mistake but I don’t think he got outmarked all day by his opponent and always made sure the ball came to ground - which is always a great sign.
No totally. Did not have a great day but a lot of the ball kicked to him he brought to ground and we held it in the forward half. If he was being out marked time and time again it would have been more of a concern.anyone else a bit worried about Chook? he's been good all year and structurally he's very important for us...but he was ordinary against the Pies - 0 goals, 3 free's against (mainly out of frustration), 1 mark, 2 tackles....hope he just had an off day and bounces back against the Blues this week. OR we could rest him and give Ambrose a go at full forward against the Blues...???
anyone else a bit worried about Chook? he's been good all year and structurally he's very important for us...but he was ordinary against the Pies - 0 goals, 3 free's against (mainly out of frustration), 1 mark, 2 tackles....hope he just had an off day and bounces back against the Blues this week. OR we could rest him and give Ambrose a go at full forward against the Blues...???
Re: Cale Hooker
Very fast. 2.88 in the 20m sprint and a 7.94 in agility, with good endurance all at 195cm. Seems like an athlete, but can he play footy?
He's not 195 anymore either, I wonder if that was his legs growing a bit more and that caused his hammies to go?This is in the first few posts in this thread (for whatever reason I was diverted to page 1 or palm mashed or something).
Imagine if Hooker maintained that athleticism proportionate to the weight gain (I assume everyone slows a bit with the weight).
Hooker would have been the key defender of his generation and in the discussion as one of the best ever. Like the rich man's version of Harris Andrews (if you could picture such a thing).
He's not 195 anymore either, I wonder if that was his legs growing a bit more and that caused his hammies to go?
anyone else a bit worried about Chook? he's been good all year and structurally he's very important for us...but he was ordinary against the Pies - 0 goals, 3 free's against (mainly out of frustration), 1 mark, 2 tackles....hope he just had an off day and bounces back against the Blues this week. OR we could rest him and give Ambrose a go at full forward against the Blues...???