Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch #27: Jack Darling

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I don't think it's reasonable to expect a 32 year old KPF to second ruck on a 5 day break. With Maley coming on, I'd expect (hope) that Darling can now be managed
It’s so dumb that we kept him rucking when we finally have Finnbar to do this

He just needs to stay forward as a target to draw a man away from larkey
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Every week the move Darling to the ruck move feels dumber.

And every week we double down and persist.

We might as well relist Hugh Greenwood and put him in the ruck. At least we'd get a defensive mid out of it.
 
How about Clarko and Monkey say let’s not do the chop out Ruck role as it’s clearly not working. Instead play the forward role and go 100% at it for the TOG. Well let Teakle and Maley cover for you in the Rucks thay they are better at it. If you can give us 12 possessions a game, crash a few packs and 1.5 goals a game. That is the standard we are long for. Are you In, or Out?
 
Last edited:
Gee. Its almost like those critical of his recruiting could see what our highly paid footy staff couldn't.
A 30 something wasn't going to have a remarkable form reversal, despite the delusions of some on our footy dept.

The fact the Eagles of all teams couldn't get rid of him quick enough was warning enough surely.

Even for bloody Rawlings.
 
The concern is the old fella backed up after 5 days.or tried too. And when I suggest this is wrong.To ex NMFC person . He goes with the Denis Pagan to assistant coaches but Matthew that's half of the story, what's the second part . My answer of ask your mate Brady ****en Rawlings, ends with us bickering.

The point as to why Darling played, there was no one ****en else
 
Chris Pratt Laugh GIF by Parks and Recreation
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The best 2nd forward / relief ruck we could find in the last 4 years was a washed up Jack Darling who was dropped by WC and then we give him two years and then we keep playing him?
 
Hang all your heads in shame. Overrated as a player and add him to the list of recruits that should never happen
He cost nothing and there's plenty we could delist. And he does set good standards off field. I've no issue with getting him. Just ffs why is his name glued to the board. Oh I answered that previously.
 
The concern is the old fella backed up after 5 days.or tried too. And when I suggest this is wrong.To ex NMFC person . He goes with the Denis Pagan to assistant coaches but Matthew that's half of the story, what's the second part . My answer of ask your mate Brady ****en Rawlings, ends with us bickering.

The point as to why Darling played, there was no one ****en else

Have you upset him again?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Every week the move Darling to the ruck move feels dumber.

And every week we double down and persist.

We might as well relist Hugh Greenwood and put him in the ruck. At least we'd get a defensive mid out of it.

Without his rucking he’d have nothing going for him.

Hang all your heads in shame. Overrated as a player and add him to the list of recruits that should never happen

You weren’t on your pat Malone there duckster
There was a few of us on here that knew he was cooked.
 
He didn't cost nothing. Pick 67.

James Hird went for pick 79..:p
Pretty sure WC "pick 67" didn't get used. Draft went to 71 but we got River Stevens at 67 and WC didn't pick anyone after 67 (unless it became pick 65.)
 
I am actually trying to figure out why he has dropped off so I watched back the tapes.

Darling must be so frustrated because the forwards are all congesting the contest at once all going up for it and his impact suffers.

He really is trying to straighten them up but the habits won't go away.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch #27: Jack Darling

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top