Delisted #28: Mitch Brown - Joins Melbourne as a rookie during the supplemental selection period - 3/12

Remove this Banner Ad

BrunoV

Brownlow Medallist
May 5, 2009
17,089
21,072
AFL Club
Essendon
I think this is a key point. I agree with Bruno that Brown’s style won’t cut it in intense games. However I disagree that Begley presented much of a better option this particular September. Baguley certainly not. We don’t have the cattle this year. Maybe Zerk-Thatcher or Hayley back and Ambrose forward? But Ambrose is quite limited forward and was Zerk or Hartley really gonna hold down Kennedy or Darling? No, probably not.

No one is talking Stewart but Worsfold would have dreamed in Feb of a fit and firing Daniher / Stringer / Stewart / Fantasia / Walla / Smith forward line.

Brown has stepped into the breach. Good on him. But this year just didn’t turn out.

I think the point re Begley has been missed.

Don't compare him to some ideal standard. Compare him to the game Brown has dished up every time the heat has been on.

It's hardly a compliment to say he could have been selected. If we favoured competitiveness we'd have selected him and even at his absolute worst would we have been any worse off?

I hate doing this, but the 3 pages before Thursday night are me and others arguing about this exact thing and Brown failing because, as I've said numerous times, no half competent side playing finals footy is going to let the guy float around getting cheap kicks.
 

BrunoV

Brownlow Medallist
May 5, 2009
17,089
21,072
AFL Club
Essendon
He did not play a single game this year with both McKernan and Daniher also in the side, but if you are that determined to declare Brown as best 22 on the back of a couple of 26-man squad selections in the community series practice matches then go for your life.

Very brave to make any of the usual assumptions about pre-season given that way our season started.

Brown also displaced Stewart in the side last year.

Fact is he has played every game when fit for the last 2 years (including at the expense of developing Stewart). It's an assumption that he's not best 22 based on the understanding that he sucks.

Problem is Worsfold has an extensive track records when it comes to non-competitive players.
 
Last edited:

Yoda_

Brownlow Medallist
May 6, 2007
28,010
13,623
South East Suburbs
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Tottenham Hotspurs, Melbourne Vixen
Was just doing a best 22 AFL & VFL sides. With the guys I would be looking to bring in, a move to CHB (albeit in the VFL) should be on the cards.

He shouldn't be getting a game in the AFL line up whilst the VFL side looks good on paper with him in the forward line, we still need to look to the future and that should be a Buzza/Frampton at FF with Stewart at CHF and Gown playing third fiddle.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Lore

Moderator ❀
Dec 14, 2015
18,992
22,947
AFL Club
Essendon
Low grade calf strain, won't affect his off-season program (which probably means he should be ready for the start of pre-season.)
Hardworking forward Mitch Brown suffered a low-grade calf strain in the Bombers’ season-ending loss to the Eagles. It is not expected to greatly interrupt his off-season program.
 

owen87

Norm Smith Medallist
Apr 23, 2016
6,167
7,902
AFL Club
Essendon
Problem with Brown is he's really best suited as a hard running 3rd tall type player, asking him to be the 2nd target alongside a (very) inconsistent McKernan isn't really his go-to as it forces him in to contested marking situations.

I like Brown, his ability to play back or forward gives us good versatility in a game, and in a functional forwardline I can see him adding value, imagine him playing alongside a Daniher - McKernan pairing in the role Laverde was largely allowed to play.

He's been asked to play beyond his remit this year, and I think he's been servicable as the depth player he is.
 

Yoda_

Brownlow Medallist
May 6, 2007
28,010
13,623
South East Suburbs
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Tottenham Hotspurs, Melbourne Vixen
Problem with Brown is he's really best suited as a hard running 3rd tall type player, asking him to be the 2nd target alongside a (very) inconsistent McKernan isn't really his go-to as it forces him in to contested marking situations.

I like Brown, his ability to play back or forward gives us good versatility in a game, and in a functional forwardline I can see him adding value, imagine him playing alongside a Daniher - McKernan pairing in the role Laverde was largely allowed to play.

He's been asked to play beyond his remit this year, and I think he's been servicable as the depth player he is.
Yep, agreed!

Ideally if the list is fit he plays CHB in the reserves next year. A fit and firing Daniher/McKernan combo should be the starting fwd's whilst Brown isn't fitting in ahead of Hooker/Hurley/Ambrose in defence. In the magoos we need to keep developing Gown whilst Stewart (if fit obviously) plays CHF for us. I would even be looking to bring in another young KPF which pushes Brown to CHB alongside a developing BZT.
 

Mikevk123

Club Legend
Jun 25, 2019
1,145
911
AFL Club
Essendon
He’s been serviceable enough over the years. Kicked 21.13 this season which is his best output. Would it be wise to give him a rookie contract for next season?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yoda_

Brownlow Medallist
May 6, 2007
28,010
13,623
South East Suburbs
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Tottenham Hotspurs, Melbourne Vixen
He'll be retained. Unlikely to find better depth and it's an area we sorely need depth. Not sure if that would be as a rookie or not.
I don't mind moving him to the rookie list. Gives us depth at both ends of the ground and for a very minimal contract.
 

Milanista28

Brownlow Medallist
Dec 2, 2014
13,784
22,263
AFL Club
Essendon
Buzza or any other DFA could be lined up?

Interesting call, but if we are fully fit he's well and truly down the pecking order.

All the best Mitch you always gave 100%
 

Vindicater

Norm Smith Medallist
Jul 16, 2013
8,335
10,426
AFL Club
Essendon
I am fine with this.

Has been a serviceable servant but clearly goes missing when the pressure ramps up. (not the only one mind you).

He won't be picked up on the rookie list.

He was never a KPF so the fact Daniher, Smack and Stewart are injury prone does not bother me.
 

Top Bottom