One good game is not improvement and i'm sorry i have to simplify things for you as when you look at improvement you don't pick out the one outlier and make this the emphasis of your results. You statistically look at his previous 44 games b4 we got him and see if he's improved over the course of the next lot of games.
Now any body who can make a simple statistical analysis can see he hasn't .Get it?
I thought you were leaving?
Anyways, I'd argue that you haven't seen even half of his games prior to him coming to Richmond.
I still don't understand this sudden urgency that he needs to be a gun straight away. If we took someone at pick 6, 7, 8 they would be having a similar season to Prestia, or even not playing. Take Brodie, Bowes as examples they were taken around where our pick would have been, the former I'm not even sure if he has played a senior game yet. How they progress in comparison to Prestia is what remains to be seen.
We signed Prestia on a five year deal and it's absolutely absurd to start claiming he is a failed pick after half a season worth of games.
He is coming off injury, a limited pre-season and limited training early on in the season.
He has only missed one game this year where people were worried about him staying on the park.
If we could talk directly to Balme, Caracella et al. I could guarantee you they would argue he has improved in his recent patch of matches from earlier on in the year.
If you're expecting immediate improvement after an injury riddled year then you have no idea how recovery works.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk