Parquet Court
Club Legend
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2010
- Posts
- 1,642
- Reaction score
- 716
- AFL Club
- Richmond
So basically you want more boundaries and wickets, why not just have fielding restrictions the entire time? Would do the exact job you want to be done. Having better bowlers on during the 15-40 period isn't going to stop the other team from knocking singles around. If anything it might lower overall scores which is exactly what you don't want. Likelyhood of scoring a boundary of a McGrath with the field back in over 25 is far less likely then off a Hussey. With your 'solution' you would see the exact same batting during 15-40 or a lot of wickets and teams going out for 150 before they even get close to batting out the 50 overs.
lower scores is not a bad thing in my opinion, manufacturing the game to get between 275 and 300 each match has the same effect of homogeneity that we are experiencing with ODIs at present.
i am in favour of a tiered bowling restrictions, ie: 12, 10, 8, 6 etc:
so you can have your best bowler bowl 12, then someone who can bowl up to 10 and so on. it might not necessarily be the same bowler each match, depending on conditions, form and what not.




