- Apr 13, 2011
- 7,546
- 24,023
- AFL Club
- Richmond
He needs 5 weeks to prove he's not at the level, he obviously lacks confidence, and very likely ability at the level but give him a good swing at it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
StagingFree kick to Sampson
He won’t gain confidence if he is dropped after just one game. It’ll be interesting to see how it goesHe needs 5 weeks to prove he's not at the level, he obviously lacks confidence, and very likely ability at the level but give him a good swing at it.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
ive been on TT and hops back since they got to the club, all admit it was a good game by both of them, they need that sort of grit to be effective. still think theyll be overtaken, but love the fight they put up. credit to them.enjoy the win, you probably stuck a knife into taranto, hopper, macca, dow and co in previous posts and all have contributed to our future and our couple of wins so far. ryan needs to play a serious second fiddle to nank and allow nank rests and management. end of year ryan will be judged....not now.
we could easily give simms a taste this week. he has such a low bar to hurdle to be our preferred back up ruckman there's no real risk attached. we dont want simms to be 25 and still playing like an 18 year old, he's a lump of a lad now give him a shot.Don't think he will ever be a starting ruckman, but he is fine as a back up ruck and depth option. At least he has the versatility to play forward, they say talls are always 4 years away from being 4 years away. I really don't see the problem with keeping him around, saves us having to go and pinch a back up from another club and don't think it'd be prudent to over index on ruck stocks. Thinks Sims should be ahead of him in the pecking order though
Personally i don’t think he is currently good enough as a backup. I really don’t want to be disrespectful to Samson but i don’t know how you feel he’s preforming to the required level?Don't think he will ever be a starting ruckman, but he is fine as a back up ruck and depth option. At least he has the versatility to play forward, they say talls are always 4 years away from being 4 years away. I really don't see the problem with keeping him around, saves us having to go and pinch a back up from another club and don't think it'd be prudent to over index on ruck stocks. Thinks Sims should be ahead of him in the pecking order though
Interesting takeI'm not sure what people were exactly expecting when Ryan needed to ruck against Witts when better, more experienced rucks struggle with Witts. Hell, I feel like Nank rarely has a good game against Witts, and was probably well beaten in the ruck against Witts for most of the game last night.

True, but watch the skill error right at the start where he tries to use his body to block using both hands, but misses. That is an error in his craft and he sadly doesn’t have the bulk to use his body effectively. Granted he was up against a seasoned opponent, but I haven’t really seen much improvement from him during his time at the club. It’s sad, but true.His foot clearly slips
Interesting take
You realise it’s the AFL right?
Ryan has to play against Witts … and Gawn, Grundy, English, Marshall, Xerri, etc.
If he can’t compete against them, there’s no use being there
Poor Samson, he had to ruck against someone![]()
Q4 Ryan starting was odd; Ryan staying on for 10 minutes was weird; given the comeback; Ryan even played on after Nank returned. With injured foot. Trainor barely got on the ground.My point is about expectation vs reality for what Ryan can do as a ruck/fwd. Is anyone asking him to be the main ruck? If not, let's not judge him as if he is one.
I'm just pointing out that in Ryan's first game back, he's up against Witts, one of the most experienced rucks in the AFL that (like I point out) even Nank struggles against (and Nank has done well in the past against the likes of Gawn and Grundy).
More often than not, your 2nd ruck will be against the opposition's 2nd ruck, and Ryan at the very least matched Read's influence at ruck contests. We tried something a bit different in that last quarter (which I don't actually necessarily mind, but did mean that Nank was stuck on the bench for longer than we probably wanted).
Also, it's not like we haven't seen Ryan do well against those rucks you mention (albeit in patches). I have clear memories of Ryan equalising, if not beating, Tim English back when English was still a good ruck back 2 or 3 seasons ago. English was giving Nank a bath out of the middle (Dogs had 6 centre clearances vs our 2), and it wasn't until Ryan went into the middle did we actually feel like we weren't being slaughtered from that area of the ground (both the feeling you get from watching the game, as well as off the stats sheet).
we drafted Sims. Nank's got 2 years? Sweet aint bad, Meek is good.This guy is so shit. Free agent ruck and a young drafted needed in next 2 years.
Q4 Ryan starting was odd; Ryan staying on for 10 minutes was weird; given the comeback; Ryan even played on after Nank returned. With injured foot. Trainor barely got on the ground.
Do they still use a runner to get messages out there?
Unless we Capuano him.Still on our list for another 2 years after this one LOL
Would have to assume he wasNot getting the melts honestly besides that last quarter he was more then serviceable. We don't know if he was carrying that injury also in the last.
picked him up like a handbag jfcRagdolled
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
No current season stats available
No current season stats available