- Nov 14, 2010
- 42,148
- 46,404
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Thanks Charlie
Should have kept Ham
At least for 1 more year and a full preseason
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks Charlie
its called churn, you really have to keep moving potentual players through the system,What’s the point in selecting him in the first place, seriously. Just wasting the kids time.
Could not have said it butter myself.its called churn, you really have to keep moving potentual players through the system,
I mean if Tom ******* lynch takes a spot over ham that would be disappointing because we couldn’t manage a soft cap reductionits called churn, you really have to keep moving potentual players through the system,
What’s the point in selecting him in the first place, seriously. Just wasting the kids time.
We selected him as a speculative MSD pick and got a very close look at him for 6 months.
It didn't work out for Charlie which is unfortunate, but I doubt he thinks it was a waste of time, we gave him a shot and he knows a lot more about what he needs to do to make the grade now.
Melbourne won the flag and had no injuries all year. Understand that one. We are bottom of the ladder and wasted 4 months of development into a guy who we didn’t see in the long term. When will the recruiters be held accountable? Waste of everyone’s time.Meh, Melbourne desisted the bloke they got in the mid season draft today too.
It's tough on the kid, but it's not a massive list management stuff up.
Melbourne won the flag and had no injuries all year. Understand that one. We are bottom of the ladder and wasted 4 months of development into a guy who we didn’t see in the long term. When will the recruiters be held accountable? Waste of everyone’s time.
I can understand that. But it also does not reflect well on the recruiting for the MSD when it was a chance to pick for the future.It is bad luck for Charlie, i Would think after watching him for the time he was at the club they don’t think he can add value to the list, I would prefer they did it now and not waste his time.
I can understand that. But it also does not reflect well on the recruiting for the MSD when it was a chance to pick for the future.
A bad decision has been made either way.
If we could pick up Jacob Edwards as a long term prospect in the mid season draft, why couldn’t we have done that in the second round? It was a waste of everyone’s time delisting him. What VFL footy experience?It was a free hit. Your chances of finding some hidden gem in the second round of a mid season draft is very low. Nothing has been lost for either party really, we got a look and didn’t think he warranted a list spot, he got to train in an elite environment and taste vfl footy. He would of barely played any footy at all if he didn’t get picked up as nab league didn’t go ahead.
We stated we were picking kids for the future, not instant top up players. Would hope, that if this was the case, they had selected someone who would fit this bill fore longer than a disjointed half season.You are picking from “scraps” that weren’t picked in their original draft years. We weren’t going to take a middle age state league player at this stage in our build. I’m struggling to see how this reflects poorly on the recruiting team.
How do you know if Jacob Edwards will be any good? It is purely speculative at this stage of his career.If we could pick up Jacob Edwards as a long term prospect in the mid season draft, why couldn’t we have done that in the second round? It was a waste of everyone’s time delisting him. What VFL footy experience?