Player Watch #34: Jack Graham - Part 2

[TigerImposter]

Nah fu** this bloke

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lol Melbourne Storm cost me a multi for $980 last week after leading 18/0 two minutes before HT. I reckon I could have got $50 to cover , but didn’t bother ad I thought I was home.

 

[THE_GUN]

I would like to see Graham given the job on either Neal or McClugguge next week , They were really prolific yesterday and will need to be tamed

 

[RichoLedio]

He doesn't look all that slow anymore

 

[thefendoff]

Starting to back his strength to break away from tackles now

 

[Jozzy]

I would like to see Graham given the job on either Neal or McClugguge next week , They were really prolific yesterday and will need to be tamed

I’d without a doubt put him on Neale, even if it was just at centre bounces/ball ups.

I’m sure many will debate Neale’s impact with those touches, his meters gained and what not but Neale still had a massive 14 clearances, we cannot allow him to do that again.

 

[peternorth]

Jack will play in 2 weeks

 

[THE_GUN]

I’d without a doubt put him on Neale, even if it was just at centre bounces/ball ups.

I’m sure many will debate Neale’s impact with those touches, his meters gained and what not but Neale still had a massive 14 clearances, we cannot allow him to do that again.

Exactly

If he has the ball 50 times that means our player dont have it and he wont be so wasteful all the time and we cant risk him getting it so much in a final

 

[RedmanWasHere]

1. 155 - 51. (155 - 51.) (155 - 51.) (303.92%) (A.) (FREM.)​
2. 122 - 81. (277 - 132.) (138.5 - 66.) (209.84%) (H.) (STK.)​
3. 91 - 40. (368 - 172.) (122.66 - 57.33.) (213.95%) (A.) (GEEL.)​
4. 103 - 67. (471 - 239.) (117.75 - 59.75.) (197.07%) (H.) (GWS.)​
5. 108 - 60. (579 - 299.) (115.8 - 59.8.) (193.64%) (A.) (ADEL.)​
6. 121 - 95. (700 - 394.) (116.67 - 65.66.) (177.66%) (H.) (CARL.)​
7. 82 - 118. (782 - 512.) (111.71 - 73.14.) (152.73%) (A.) (ADEL.)​
8. 102 - 89. (884 - 601.) (110.5 - 75.12.) (147.08%) (H.) (HAW.)​
9. 110 - 17. (994 - 618.) (110.44 - 68.66.) (160.84%) (H.) (BL.)​
10. 113 - 70. (1107 - 688.) (110.7 - 68.8.) (160.9%) (A.) (COLL.)​
11. 110 - 33. (1217 - 721.) (110.63 - 65.54.) (168.79%.) (H.) (FREM.)​
12. 82 - 72. (1299 - 793.) (108.25 - 66.08.) (163.80%.) (A.) (KANG.)​
13. 83 - 130. (1382 - 923.) (106.31 - 71.) (149.73%.) (A.) (Highest score conceded.) (WCE.)​
14. 105 - 77. (1487 - 1000.) (106.21 - 71.43.) (148.7%.) (H.) (STK.)​
15. 114 - 43. (1601 - 1043.) (106.73 - 69.53.) (153.5%.) (A.) (ESS.)​
16. 83 - 65. (1684 - 1108.) (105.25 - 69.25.) (152%.) (A.) (GEEL.)​
17. 93 - 67. (1777 - 1175.) (104.53 - 69.12.) (151.23%.) (H.) (SYD.)​
18. 103 - 56. (1880 - 1231.) (104.44 - 68.39.) (152.71%.) (H.) (ADEL.)​
19. 125 - 51. (2005 - 1286.) (105.53 - 67.68.) (155.91%.) (A.) (GC.) (Good day to be a Jack for Richmond.)​
20. 81 - 73. (2086 - 1359.) (104.3 - 67.95.) (153.49%.) (H.) (ESS.)​
21. 98 - 95. (2184 - 1454.) (104 - 69.24.) (150.20%.) (H.) (FOOT.)​
22. 95 - 64. (2279 - 1518.) (103.59 - 69.) (150.13%.) (H.) (+ 31.) (+ 848.) (Easily his quietest finals game.) (HAW.)​
23. 58 - 97. (2337 - 1615.) (101.61 - 70.22.) (144.7%.) (H.) (COLL.)​
24. 97 - 64. (2434 - 1679.) (101.41 - 69.96.) (144.97%.) (A.) (His highest score in 3 games.) (CARL.)​
25. 66 - 110. (2500 - 1789.) (100 - 71.56.) (139.74%.) (H.) (COLL.)​
26. 76 - 125. (2576 - 1914.) (99.1 - 73.62.) (134.58%.) (A.) (GWS.)​
27. 99 - 92. (2675 - 2006.) (99.1 - 74.3.) (133.35%.) (A but, technically for Jack, H.) (PA.)​
28. 37 - 104. (2712 - 2110.) (96.86 - 75.36.) (128.53%.) (H.) (His highest losing AFL margin plus lowest losing score.) (GEEL.)​
29. 68 - 101. (2780 - 2211.) (95.86 - 76.24.) (125.73%.) (A but, technically for Jack, H.) (ADEL.)​
30. 103 - 70. (2883 - 2281.) (96.01 - 76.03.) (126.39%.) (H but, technically for Jack, A.) (STK.)​
31. 150 - 58 (3033 - 2339.) (97.83 - 75.45.) (129.67%.) (A.) (GC.)​
32. 101 - 63 (3134 - 2402.) (97.93 - 75.07.) (130.47%.) (H.) (PA.)​
33. 98 - 66 (3232 - 2468.) (97.93 - 74.79.) (130.96%.) (A.) (COLL.) (Interesting to note the loser of both Rich/Coll games scored 66.)​
34. 93 - 60 (3325 - 2508.) (97.79 - 73.75) (132.58%.) (A) (MELB.)​
35. 73 - 45 (3398 - 2553.) (97.09 - 72.94) (133.1%.) (H) (CARL.)​
36. 88 - 82 (3486 - 2635.) (96.83 - 73.19.) (132.3%.) (H.) (WCE.)​
37. 82 - 55 (3568 - 2690.) (96.43 - 72.7.) (132.63%.) (H.) (BL.)​

Average score of games he's played in = 84.57.

Will do some recalculations at season's end as I feel like I've stuffed up.​

 

[Mr Magic]

I reckon if Jack Graham lost only a few extra pounds(slightly) he could be an even better player. He looks as though he is getting a touch lighter and his mobility is improving

 

[TigerImposter]

I reckon if Jack Graham lost only a few extra pounds(slightly) he could be an even better player. He looks as though he is getting a touch lighter and his mobility is improving

He’s certainly slimmed up and looks a fine specimen physically. I still think he lost a lot last year in doing heavier running and gym work bc of his shoulder. Also he didn’t have a preseason in his first season. He’s been a great story considering he’s done it pretty tough early on with injuries and niggles.

 

[THE_GUN]

Looking foward to his role on Neal next week , Sloan like performance expected




No Pressure on the kid though

 

[TigerImposter]

Looking foward to his role on Neal next week , Sloan like performance expected




No Pressure on the kid though

Yes I think we went in light with the pressure Sunday as we only applied 47 tackles to their 72. According to CM ,We generally average 7 more tackles than the opposition per game and average 63 tackles a game.

 

[peternorth]

Its his time to shine

 

[db26]

Expecting a big game from fridge been in great form besides last game I think week off would do him well like others.

 

[Dr Tigris]

Jack, Graham that is, is starting to come into his own. Picking up those 20 odd possessions, tackles, pressure points. He's tracking to be that good B+ or even A grader I hoped for - as I know we all expected after the 2017 GF. Just keep taking a few steps upwards and he'll be that automatic pick core player that teams are built around.

Underrated player by other teams supporters. And many tiger fans also I reckon.

 

[RichoRocks2006]

Calling it. Jack Graham is a certainty to be the next captain of the Richmond football club. What he lacks in speed he makes up for in heart. Hugh tackler and big moment player. My man crush has hit crisis levels tonight

 

[Bobby Sands]

Calling it. Jack Graham is a certainty to be the next captain of the Richmond football club. What he lacks in speed he makes up for in heart. Hugh tackler and big moment player. My man crush has hit crisis levels tonight

Finals footballer.

But Vlaus for mine.

 

[TJASTA]

* I love being right
#IWasRight

 

[Power Play]

31 wins
0 draws
7 losses

Cumulative crowd (career) = 2,201,812
Average crowd (career) = 57,942

Cumulative crowd (MCG) = 1,782,606
Average crowd (MCG) = 68,562

 

[French Tiger]

Good game from Jack , big solid body who thrives in a contest


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[JAKLAUGHING]

fu** I love being right
#IWasRight

Nothing beats being right! ❤

 

[tora tora tora]

Huge game from Jack I thought. Would love to see Jack Ross running around in a team with him. And add Balta to the wing for some pace.

 

[joelsyt]

Man he was good last night.

Did he run with Neale a little bit? Neale seemed like he had an even quieter game this week than he did in round 23, despite his two goals.

 

[tora tora tora]

Man he was good last night.

Did he run with Neale a little bit? Neale seemed like he had an even quieter game this week than he did in round 23, despite his two goals.

No he didn't run with Neale. RFC does not 'tag'...Neale was very good. I like Neale. Good footballer. Graham (& Prestia) just seemed to be tackling everyone.

 

[peternorth]

gray gray i reckon lets his opponent get the ball, and then he pounces

like a tiger.