I do feel as though its a tad harsh as well.
TBH, I think our defence as a group has been pretty great for a good run of games now including last year. Especially with injury and suspension meaning its turned over a bit.
My take on Jamie's omission is that Ryce has given him a clear role or instructions and he hasn't been able to execute or just didn't!
As stated, he'll be back soon enough.
I also have a thought as to wonder with the risk of reduced team sizes that there may be a desire to test some untried players with think have potential - but who knows
He would have kept his spot but the reality is there is a better defender now fit and ready so has had to make way... there is another def in theory knocking on the door next week too
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app