TennisPlayerAndy
Game #6 Klay
- Apr 1, 2008
- 57,705
- 101,693
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Raiders, GSW, QPR, NYM
He’s in no way dangerous when forward so doesn’t help Larkey.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can take the odd clunker, which he needs to. But yeah, young and certainly needs more time. Id be happy for that to be in the scoobsI do like his “on the edge” game play and that can be okay if done smart. There is no questioning his mongrel or his passion for the club. Ability is yet to be seen
Disagree , he was actually better & showed a heap more last year in those few games he played. He was taking good grabs , hitting contests hard & kicking goals . Has not showed any of these attributes at all this season. I was one of many here calling for his selection in 1’s again this season .What are people expecting? No improvement? .. bullshit. He has shown improvement in the VFL to earn his chance in the seniors. He wasn’t great today but ffs give him time to find his feet..
I agree, unfortunately.I’m not sure he’s taken his chance.
A few things to work on before he demands a spot.
He has been poor, although his presence does help Larks. His negatives outweighed his positives again today though.What are people expecting? No improvement? .. bullshit. He has shown improvement in the VFL to earn his chance in the seniors. He wasn’t great today but ffs give him time to find his feet..
Playing Tom Campbell gets us no where. It’s like bringing back Tyson..Disagree , he was actually better & showed a heap more last year in those few games he played. He was taking good grabs , hitting contests hard & kicking goals . Has not showed any of these attributes at all this season. I was one of many here calling for his selection in 1’s again this season .
But I’m starting to think TC is the better option for us right now .
He’s in no way dangerous when forward so doesn’t help Larkey.
He's a Ruckman first and foremost and is being asked to fill a position he won't be required for in the very near future.
He's a developing ruckman attending about 5 to 10% of bounces.4 hitouts for the game. He would want to show improvement next year for his contract to be extended.
He jumped about 3 years too early after our goal in the last to put us 4 points behind. he needs to develop, times ticking for the ladHe's a developing ruckman attending about 5 to 10% of bounces.
Playing Tom Campbell gets us no where. It’s like bringing back Tyson..
Very different from Taylor, but I get your point. If your game is based around aggression and impact, however, you need to get those things right more often than he does at the moment.Looks a Mumford type rather than a Goldy type.
Just keep playing him.
He's looked average, see that dropped mark, but he might clunk a couple and suddenly look a different player.
Bit like Taylor with his two goals today.
Yeah disagree, respectfully on your first sentence.I think the feeling is Xerri may never get to Tom Campbell's level no matter how much time is invested in him.
Could be wrong but he hasn't been convincing so far.
Yep nothing lost by giving him games for the rest of the yearJust have to keep pumping games into him, there is a chance that he could be dropped this week, but who knows.
also going to go into next season with a lot of competition with the likes of comben (even though his more of a key forward) and Edwards.
keep persisting
I guess it depends on how the coaches see him. If they see him long term playing a different role he may be better playing that in the twos for his confidence.Yep nothing lost by giving him games for the rest of the year
I guess it depends on how the coaches see him. If they see him long term playing a different role he may be better playing that in the twos for his confidence.
The tools he's shown at VFL are different to what he is being asked at AFL. I'm just saying that we don't want to destroy his confidence if we have a different role for him in the future.Well he’s clearly shown that he has the tools at vfl level let’s give him time to build at AFL level
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
The tools he's shown at VFL are different to what he is being asked at AFL. I'm just saying that we don't want to destroy his confidence if we have a different role for him in the future.
Or we could just play him in the role he did well in the VFL.
I'm in furious agreement. Maybe give him a different role at AFL level to develop them though.And that’s fine, but we need to let him develop the AFL tools at AFL level, because this will be his role if he comes in
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com