Player Watch #39: Tom Blamires - back in vs Geelong

[Outtatym]

Tell him to keep training with Frankston before we norf him and he forgets how to kick

 

[King Corey]

Barlow's pick!

 

[muttley45]

Reckon he had enough good moment's for one of those 60 second highlight vid's, over to you NMFC media dept.

 

[ohh_v]

Please don’t ruin him

 

[King Corey]

Reckon he had enough good moment's for one of those 60 second highlight vid's, over to you NMFC media dept.

Aka over to you giantroo

 

[Makeshift Park]

 

[Jack Richards]

Rowbottom with a better kick. Except he played no on-ball time.

If he doesn't play round 1, Clarko's taking the piss.

Who's spot does he take from your best 22 in the back line or bench?

 

[Disco Dew]

Who's spot does he take from your best 22 in the back line or bench?

Comfortably takes Daniel’s spot. Otherwise yeah bench. Personally think he could go well on a wing too.

 

[TennisPlayerAndy]

Has to play Round 1.

 

[Makeshift Park]

Who's spot does he take from your best 22 in the back line or bench?

If you're comparing to last year, Bailey Scott, who'll be in the twos, and FOS, who'll be playing less defence time in 2026 cause he'll be in the midfield lots (in turn he'll be taking Phillips and Simpkin's midfield time).

 

[King Hansen]

Didn't 99% of you all want Becker this time last week?? Shows how much you know

 

[perplexed]

Didn't 99% of you all want Becker this time last week?? Shows how much you know

Didn't everyone on here want both?

 

[BlueanWhiteKanga]

Didn't 99% of you all want Becker this time last week?? Shows how much you know

I wouldn't say 99% of people wanted Becker over Blamires. I think it was more a case that it was looking more likely that Becker was going be picked up, especially based on the Melbourne selection.

 

[year of the roo]

Didn't 99% of you all want Becker this time last week?? Shows how much you know

Struggling to find your post indicating how far Blamires was ahead of Becker. Did you delete it?

 

[King Corey]

Struggling to find your post indicating how far Blamires was ahead of Becker. Did you delete it?

Not one post about either candidate or the SSP selection process. Or any commentary on Blamires before the match.

So.. offer no insight, no opinions, no predictions on any of it but still roll up after the event to snipe others because..?

 

[kool kangas]

While l would like to see Blamires play RD1 but it wont happen unless he's on the bench. McDonald will get picked before him eventhough he hasn't played for 6 months. Daniels will be included also. While playing a very good game should warrant a selection it seems like it doesn't when it comes to North.

 

[year of the roo]

Not one post about either candidate or the SSP selection process. Or any commentary on Blamires before the match.

So.. offer no insight, no opinions, no predictions on any of it but still roll up after the event to snipe others because..?

Oh good on you for checking. I didn't check, just assumed no such post was ever made. Not by that flog, not by any flog.

 

[footylover18]

Who's spot does he take from your best 22 in the back line or bench?

Caleb Daniel and it should't be close imo.

Kerch, Hardeman, Blamires.

 

[King Hansen]

Struggling to find your post indicating how far Blamires was ahead of Becker. Did you delete it?

I didn't say anything about. It might be why...

 

[King Hansen]

Not one post about either candidate or the SSP selection process. Or any commentary on Blamires before the match.

So.. offer no insight, no opinions, no predictions on any of it but still roll up after the event to snipe others because..?

Yeah I'll say what I want. Didn't know there was a rule about needing to have said something prior?

Looks like people within the club knew better to keyboard worriers on here....

 

[year of the roo]

I didn't say anything about. It might be why...

Why are you here?

 

[King Hansen]

Why are you here?

To remind people to stop being so ****ing reactive.

 

[perplexed]

Yeah I'll say what I want. Didn't know there was a rule about needing to have said something prior?

Looks like people within the club knew better to keyboard worriers on here....

I normally hate your posting, but this is surprisingly clever.

 

[marklovesbeer]

 

[King Corey]

Yeah I'll say what I want. Didn't know there was a rule about needing to have said something prior?

Looks like people within the club knew better to keyboard worriers on here....

It's not a rule. It just seems pointless even for a pointless forum.

But by all means feel free to sit back and launch bits of cat shit at the people who do engage in discussions and risk blowback by offering opinions.

Would it help if an automated sub-forum of you plus 10x bots was created where you could all post "go team" as auto-responses every 5 minutes?