Beerfish
Unscripted Hot Takes
- Jan 20, 2008
- 64,646
- 110,312
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Nic Martin
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Must be nice to stretch the legs out.I'm still on his bandwagon.
Well yeah...luckily I'm a shortarse!Must be nice to stretch the legs out.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'm still keen on Langford, but he needs to do a lot more before he rates the equal of Zaka.Zaka MkII. 200+ games as a spud on auto select every week.
I’ve been critical of Zaka many times in the past but he had the potential to be a fantastic role player in a premiership side, he just never had the cattle around him. If Langford could get to Zaka’s level I’d take it tbhZaka MkII. 200+ games as a spud on auto select every week.
He's not a natural mid though which has been the problem with his development. He's strengths which are good hands and a nice kick should be used at half forward, leading up to a wing to offer a target when we are bringing the ball out from defence. He can then hit targets inside 50, or kick the goal himself if hes close enough. I really hope the new coaching staff play to his strengths and stop trying to force him to be Nat Fyfe.Can't wait to watch the big fella run around in the red and black again, doesn't deserve the flak he cops IMO.
Only tall mid (not that we have a bunch to choose from tbf) we have that has an elite kick, need to force the play through him more.
Break out time Langers.
He's not a natural mid though which has been the problem with his development. He's strengths which are good hands and a nice kick should be used at half forward, leading up to a wing to offer a target when we are bringing the ball out from defence. He can then hit targets inside 50, or kick the goal himself if hes close enough. I really hope the new coaching staff play to his strengths and stop trying to force him to be Nat Fyfe.
Can be used at fwd stoppages as well to mix it up but centre bounces should be a no go zone for him.Kelly mentioned him as a forwrd so I can see him spending a bit more time as that roaming high HF, agree that could suit his game style, his kicking inside 50 needs to be utilised when he's in the team.
21?Whatever he was at the back end of 2018. Make him that
A 17 disposal a game mid?Whatever he was at the back end of 2018. Make him that
lolthe critics will be silenced.
Langford was very good against West Coast.
He seemed to be a lot stronger over the ball. He actually looks a lot bigger through the shoulders and isn't pear shaped anymore.
It's a pre-season match so the biggest question mark, being the way he stands up to premiership season intensity, is still unanswered but he can only play the game on its merits.
If he convert that as something like a baseline game (even without the 2 goals and only 20 possessions) to the regular season and the critics will be silenced.
The arse was definitely less Watsonesque. For some reason I have always hoped he would make it and I still see a lot of good signs.Langford was very good against West Coast.
He seemed to be a lot stronger over the ball. He actually looks a lot bigger through the shoulders and isn't pear shaped anymore.
It's a pre-season match so the biggest question mark, being the way he stands up to premiership season intensity, is still unanswered but he can only play the game on its merits.
If he convert that as something like a baseline game (even without the 2 goals and only 20 possessions) to the regular season and the critics will be silenced.
HFF/Wing has been where i've wanted him.What stood out to me from Langford was that he was unusually clean and didn't fumble. He also was strong when he stood over the ball to grab it. I'd have to see a lot more of that before I really buy in to Langford's stock. The game itself was very good from him. I am a believer of his forward half craft though - he kicks straight reliably and he's not a bad mark, also can deliver the ball properly into the forward 50.
My plan for him was always try him at half forward since I don't think he's really a midfielder.
He has definitely had these games before but i think his progression stalled last year when he was expected to be more of an inside mid for us. If he is left at half forward/ wing he should thrive, and im pretty sure the coaches have already come to this conclusion.Watching him play was a bit strange. He was fairly strong in the contest, clean by hands + below the knees and made the right decisions. Also looks a lot fitter.
It was so far away from what we usually see from him that I'm almost taking this game to be an outlier. I need more evidence.