Really crap arguing, mate. You just keep putting new sets of words in my mouth that bare no real relationship to what was said in the first place, while ignoring the responses. You should ask yourself why you're arguing like that, and try to avoid it in the future.
And if you think that criticism is a cop-out, you can have a direct response too - you're now claiming that China wants the status quo in Taiwan maintained, which is highly arguable, and that the US should withdraw from SoKo on the basis of "China doing what its doing now". That's the US and its allies giving up a key strategic outpost next to two Communist nations, one of which is a professed enemy, in exchange for... the 'status quo'? They already have that, obviously. Why would you do a deal to get what you already have? The whole point of these things is about managing the threat of what may happen, in the face of North Korea being bloody awful to its people.