Elroo
Premiership Player
- Jul 2, 2014
- 3,993
- 6,808
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
What city?Not in the socialism City of Denver is it cheap
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
What city?Not in the socialism City of Denver is it cheap
Sincere yes, although is prone to changing mind (not necessarily bad in itself, just the thought process is more public due to his tendency to tweet frequently)I honestly find Trump markedly more honest, sincere and effective then his predecessors Obama or Bush, Clinton Bush or Reagan
Not just on race but on first impressions based on prior experiences. Everyone has subconsciously put the person they interact with into a category; bias can be overcome but it needs a lot of self awareness.You are very much an emotional person rather than a factual one arent you. Tests on the subconscious show pretty much everyone discriminates based on race. Time to face reality.
I can’t remember (was a child at time) but when the Australia card (Id card) was proposed, was it going to be free?Who said anything about free?
Does anyone get free ID in order to open a bank account?
Unfortunately there will always be morons who believe in forms of socialism.
How do you know what he means?He doesn't mean that it doesn't exist at all. Just that it doesn't to any significant degree. Which is correct. You are all deliberately misunderstanding him in order to feel victorious!
Well the last sentence is a good thing at the individual personal level (better to be able to work than not)The e-verify system which allows employers to see whether an applicant is legal or not has been down since December 22 because of the shutdown. Thanks to Trump it's easier than ever for people to find work.
Gabbard (to my limited knowledge) seems to be a candidate who could swing part of trumps base with similar desire to be more isolationist and less intervention.Gabbard-Sanders would be a good ticket imo.
Per interaction with police, white people are more likely to be shot by them than black people. The myth that unarmed black people are overrepresented in police shooting stats has been disproven a thousand times. Your opinion is based on emotion, and not facts.
It cites studies m8. I'm trying to teach others how to do their own homework. No more spoon feeding!States it’s been disproven 1000 times. When questioned for proof cites a Wikipedia post.
Quoting Wikipedia! Humor.It cites studies m8. I'm trying to teach others how to do their own homework. No more spoon feeding!
Quoting Wikipedia! Humor.
Probably just as easy to cut and paste?its a step up from Quora
Haha, I think we're pretty much diametrically opposed on how to do things, but that's OK. Interesting that you support Medicare For All and campaign finance reform/repeal of Citizens United, and are on the fence with minimum wage... they're basically the three issues that need to be addressed immediately. Perhaps we aren't that different on desired outcome, only ideology?
Appreciate the debate, and I'm sure it'll continue.
Exactly. We categorise subconsciously. And one of the simplest categories we all make is categorize those in to uses and thems. Those who are worthy of our empathy, protection and love and those who we see as competitiors or even enemies and other races often fall into the them category as do various other forms of categoies. People from other religions, people from the wrong side of the tracks, people of a different social status, even different hair colour. And this seperation is done before we are even consciously aware of them. We can use reasoning to overrule our subconcious cateogization but as you say, it often takes awareness of how our subconscious mind works. Without that knowledge we instead tend to just use reasoning to justify our subconscious views.Not just on race but on first impressions based on prior experiences. Everyone has subconsciously put the person they interact with into a category; bias can be overcome but it needs a lot of self awareness.
This is more relevant to the gun control thread i thinkNSFW video. This shows how hard it is to be a cop in the US. One second you're having a friendly chat with an 18 year old about his dreads, nek minnit he's firing 4 shots at you and 2 taser hits fail to stop him.
Easy for the armchair experts to criticise their caution and distrust!
https://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2017/05/gunman_shot_killed_by_police_i.html
Of those three there will be plenty of dem candidates that will run on cheaper pharma and big money out of politics. You can argue they won’t actually do it when in power, and Bernie no doubt will try, but they as we see with Obama and trump, wanting to do something and actually being able to do it with congress are two different things.But Bernie has other Policies the other Dems won't run on, like cheaper Pharmaceuticals (most of the other Dems get donations from the Pharma Companies), Free College and Large Donation Money Out of Politics
Don’t confuse a lack of desire for a lack of ability depending on Congress.Like I've said, there's a difference between running on it, and having a desire to actually deliver it.
Of those three there will be plenty of dem candidates that will run on cheaper pharma and big money out of politics. You can argue they won’t actually do it when in power, and Bernie no doubt will try, but they as we see with Obama and trump, wanting to do something and actually being able to do it with congress are two different things.
Bernie also has been on wrong side of gun control.
His main opponent in the dem primary won’t be a Clinton centerist, unless Biden runs, and really hope he doesn’t
One of the reasons the progressive base is skeptical of everyone other than Bernie is because they were promised big changes in 2008 and got very little.
Yeah Bernie will be ancient by the time 2020 rolls around but the base trust him to actually fight for what they want. He has a track record of it.
What I will say for Trump is he is smart enough to keep throwing red meat to his base (ie the religious nutters, gun nuts and alt right types). His base will turn out for him in 2020. That is a guarantee.
The Dems need someone to fire up their base to come out for them like in 2008. I think Bernie is the only one that can realistically do that.
Surely Trump is not a russian spySeems a matter of time now before information detailing Trump’s compromising by the Russian state emerges, the below in addition to his leaking of classified intelligence and his campaign’s conspiracy to undermine the electoral process are pointing towards something of that nature as the only logical endpoint of this sage. The flood of revelations which have been buried in the shutdown controversy may also point to Trump’s motivations there, keep the shutdown going to distract his base and the wider public from the sordid allegations of conspiring against the American state with Russia.
President Trump has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal details of his conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, including on at least one occasion taking possession of the notes of his own interpreter and instructing the linguist not to discuss what had transpired with other administration officials, current and former U.S. officials said.
Trump did so after a meeting with Putin in 2017 in Hamburg that was also attended by then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. U.S. officials learned of Trump’s actions when a White House adviser and a senior State Department official sought information from the interpreter beyond a readout shared by Tillerson.
The constraints that Trump imposed are part of a broader pattern by the president of shielding his communications with Putin from public scrutiny and preventing even high-ranking officials in his own administration from fully knowing what he has told one of the United States’ main adversaries.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.34beda711ca5
I think they said "unwittingly" or in Spook Speak, a UI (Useful Idiot)Surely Trump is not a russian spy
Seems a matter of time now before information detailing Trump’s compromising by the Russian state emerges, the below in addition to his leaking of classified intelligence and his campaign’s conspiracy to undermine the electoral process are pointing towards something of that nature as the only logical endpoint of this sage.
The flood of revelations which have been buried in the shutdown controversy may also point to Trump’s motivations there, keep the shutdown going to distract his base and the wider public from the sordid allegations of conspiring against the American state with Russia.