You love trying to get a slice of the man! Unfortunately for you, Im married. Please dm in future to keep the thread on topic.You accusing others of playing the man.Too funny!
Lets try with, is biden left enough to be the 2024 nom?
Play Nice 46th President of the United States: Joe Biden (1) O Brave New World
- Thread starter Deaneus!
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Lets try with, is biden left enough to be the 2024 nom?
Did you read the whole paragraph because i address what you wanted after clever part. (I know you only read half the posts).
as really not worth the effort of exchanging posts as he always reverts to insults.
Alright, thats actually really pissed me off. Rag on me all you want, but never say anything about my wife. I want to say alot more right now but mods will send me.
LuvtheKangas
Premium Platinum
North Melbourne - 2024 Hugh Greenwood Player Sponsor
Veteran
North Melbourne - 2023 Ailish Considine and Bella Eddy Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - Bella Eddey and Vicki Wall Player Sponsor - Season 7
North Melbourne - 2023 Aaron Hall and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
10k Posts
North Melbourne - 2022 Aaron Hall and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2021 Taylor Garner and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
- Mar 11, 2006
- 23,607
- 59,124
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
The irony of you posting this after getting annoyed at a post labelling you inarticulate.
You've been missing the point my young friend. It is not the bias, yes they are all biased, it is the actual content. Is it factual and real. Is it from a report that is sourced to traditional professional journalistic standards? Do they display some of the hard evidence such as public records or officially filed documents?
Many of the MSNBC shows describe real events with language that leads the viewer to certain conclusions. Almost all news outlets do to some extent. Those are one's to avoid if the actual news information is not new. They repeat the same story over and over again which sucks. Even a channel like The Hill, which delights in roasting the Dems, shades everything with their language choices.
Others though actually explain evidence and context of that news event. Those are very informative and fact based because you can usually check up on them. These shows are rarer. There are many more of them in left leaning channels than right.
Right wing news is the least fact based that I have found. I thought I check out a couple, report started ok then mentioned Fauci could face indictments and I clicked off. I watched a little Fox, Hannity had on a Trump lawyer and was talking about Trumps lawsuit against Hillary months ago. Hannity is 'I agree with this lawsuit" and using words like 'dirty', 'phony', 'spying on Trump', etc to describe Hillary. All one sided opinion. This is what turned me off Fox much earlier during the O'Reilly years, they don't inform, they lecture, preach or command. There is some talking at the viewer, using 'you', 'I know for a fact' etc. But millions of people only watch those prime time shows and think they are news and the truth. Go down the schedule to Fox and Friends. How many times have they been shown to be full of s**t. I used to watch the real news program there. Shep Smith would normally read the regular news of the day, no real slant either way, but at the end would add 'but they didn't something something' which referred to the GOP alternative fact. Obviously added by the producer. Remember their motto - Fair and Balanced
Look at the Trump document thing. Rubio is the top GOP on the intelligence committee. Read the BS he has spouted knowing full well the danger to national security that is posed by the missing docs. No clearer example of the right wing propaganda posing as facts.
Sorry for the mini rant.
So the point is look for the facts behind the bias. Can they be verified or is it just a word salad of buzz words to distract you with rage at an imaginary abomination.
How do you still have this rant after listening to russia non-sences for 3 frinkin years? "Walls closing in", "the beginning of the end", "tipping point", "bombshell" and the list goes on. Kyle Rittenhouse, people that used left wing sources thought the thugs that he shot where black!. The Covington kid settled with the out of court because they just ran a story that was false, no facts at all!You've been missing the point my young friend. It is not the bias, yes they are all biased, it is the actual content. Is it factual and real. Is it from a report that is sourced to traditional professional journalistic standards? Do they display some of the hard evidence such as public records or officially filed documents?
Many of the MSNBC shows describe real events with language that leads the viewer to certain conclusions. Almost all news outlets do to some extent. Those are one's to avoid if the actual news information is not new. They repeat the same story over and over again which sucks. Even a channel like The Hill, which delights in roasting the Dems, shades everything with their language choices.
Others though actually explain evidence and context of that news event. Those are very informative and fact based because you can usually check up on them. These shows are rarer. There are many more of them in left leaning channels than right.
Right wing news is the least fact based that I have found. I thought I check out a couple, report started ok then mentioned Fauci could face indictments and I clicked off. I watched a little Fox, Hannity had on a Trump lawyer and was talking about Trumps lawsuit against Hillary months ago. Hannity is 'I agree with this lawsuit" and using words like 'dirty', 'phony', 'spying on Trump', etc to describe Hillary. All one sided opinion. This is what turned me off Fox much earlier during the O'Reilly years, they don't inform, they lecture, preach or command. There is some talking at the viewer, using 'you', 'I know for a fact' etc. But millions of people only watch those prime time shows and think they are news and the truth. Go down the schedule to Fox and Friends. How many times have they been shown to be full of s**t. I used to watch the real news program there. Shep Smith would normally read the regular news of the day, no real slant either way, but at the end would add 'but they didn't something something' which referred to the GOP alternative fact. Obviously added by the producer. Remember their motto - Fair and Balanced
Look at the Trump document thing. Rubio is the top GOP on the intelligence committee. Read the BS he has spouted knowing full well the danger to national security that is posed by the missing docs. No clearer example of the right wing propaganda posing as facts.
Sorry for the mini rant.
So the point is look for the facts behind the bias. Can they be verified or is it just a word salad of buzz words to distract you with rage at an imaginary abomination.
So yeah its both sides. I think we can both agree that we would like no biased news with just the facts but that will never happen. Also be very wary of anyone that claims they are the once source of truth like out friend Jacinda.
Establishment media propagated another racism hoax
Brigham Young University has found no evidence that a racial slur was yelled at Duke volleyball player Rachel Richardson, meaning establishment media once again jumped on a racial hoax without waiting for evidence. BYU interviewed 50 eyewitnesses and reviewed “security and raw footage from all...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
And another one
"It didn’t matter to establishment media, which treated this as true from the moment the accusation was made. CNN, ESPN, NPR, ABC, NBC, the New York Times, and the Washington Post all reported the nonexistent slurs as fact without bothering to look into the accusation and find out if it was true. (We used to call that “journalism.”) Jemele Hill, the Atlantic’s go-to race-baiter, predictably pushed the false claim."
- Jul 1, 2013
- 21,994
- 18,412
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fulham, 76ers, Cubs, Bills
Do you reckon Abrams wins in Georgia?
No kemp and walker seem to being pulling away. Lets see if stacey accepts her loss this time.
Yes, my son.
Maggie5
Moderator
- Moderator
- #8,742
How can one not trust this right wing source?
Washington Examiner... .
They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
Owned by Philip Anschutz, an American billionaire entrepreneur who describes himself as a “conservative Christian.” Anschutz is also the owner of the right-leaning Weekly Standard and has donated millions of dollars to right-leaning causes, including anti-LGBT groups, such as the Family Research Council, which has been labeled a hate group.
Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.
Washington Examiner... .
They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
Owned by Philip Anschutz, an American billionaire entrepreneur who describes himself as a “conservative Christian.” Anschutz is also the owner of the right-leaning Weekly Standard and has donated millions of dollars to right-leaning causes, including anti-LGBT groups, such as the Family Research Council, which has been labeled a hate group.
Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.
Do you understand what went on in GA in the run up to that election?
Have you ever been to GA?
- Jul 1, 2013
- 21,994
- 18,412
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fulham, 76ers, Cubs, Bills
Seems similar to NY, then.
NY wont flip, seeing what bites i would get on it.
I think this might be the last time GA goes red, maybe 2024 but long term its a blue state unfortunately
Maggie thats how someone on the right also feels when left wing sources get trotted out. Its the people who dont see this that are the ones getting played.How can one not trust this right wing source?
Washington Examiner... .
They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports, and omit information reporting that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
Owned by Philip Anschutz, an American billionaire entrepreneur who describes himself as a “conservative Christian.” Anschutz is also the owner of the right-leaning Weekly Standard and has donated millions of dollars to right-leaning causes, including anti-LGBT groups, such as the Family Research Council, which has been labeled a hate group.
Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.
- Jul 1, 2013
- 21,994
- 18,412
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Fulham, 76ers, Cubs, Bills
Yawn
Please, you remember that. You where entertained.
- Sep 17, 2019
- 22,272
- 35,294
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #8,750
Facts don’t care about your feelings.
- Status
Similar threads
