4th test Australia v India at the Gabba 1030 AEDT

Remove this Banner Ad

Here's an interesting figure.
315193.1.png
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That's why cricket is a fickle game.

Wade Marnus and Green all present chances around 40. Wade gets out, other 2 survive.

Ones a disgrace to cricket the others are varying levels of hero.


People need to relax.

There's a difference between an outside edge against a ball that's swinging and whatever went through Wade's head. The ball was doing nothing, Australia was in a commanding position, and he let them back in.

He also played similarly dumb shots twice already in the series.
 
There's a difference between an outside edge against a ball that's swinging and whatever went through Wade's head. The ball was doing nothing, Australia was in a commanding position, and he let them back in.

He also played similarly dumb shots twice already in the series.

Wade's decision to take it on wasn't bad, it was just terrible execution. Same with Marnus. The difference is the history of poor shots.
 
Warne is one of the most astute judges of cricket, I have heard, from the individual to the current state of play.
As a personality he his cringeworthy with his vacuous and banal pop culture references coupled with his venal and vindictive sledges at others how aren't there to clap back.
What do you think about his tendency to repeat himself. Like what do you think of his tendency of repeating himself?
 
ABC Grandstand boys talking about way back when when they played. occasionally mentioning todays game 😁
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What do you think about his tendency to repeat himself. Like what do you think of his tendency of repeating himself?

Tim Paine looks neat.

Tim Paine looks neat.

Has his collar up.

Has his collar up.
 
Wade's decision to take it on wasn't bad, it was just terrible execution. Same with Marnus. The difference is the history of poor shots.

It was a ball just back of a length outside off. Playing aggressively is fine. Playing that shot was just dumb.

Marnus' wasn't so bad but he definitely lost his concentration a bit after passing 100. He played 2 or 3 false/unconvincing shots in a short period before his wicket fell.
 
I don't mind Mark Howard, he's a bit prone to being star f***ed but for the most part he realises that he's that he's an anchor rather than expert ball by ball commentator.

Just can’t stand his goody two shoes thing he’s got going
 
What do you think about his tendency to repeat himself. Like what do you think of his tendency of repeating himself?
Someone should ask him about the time he "Accidently" kicked his stumps over in England.
 
Wade's decision to take it on wasn't bad, it was just terrible execution. Same with Marnus. The difference is the history of poor shots.

No it was stupid. Ball was nowhere near short enough. There’s a reason he and Head average 30 odd
 
ABC Grandstand boys talking about way back when when they played. occasionally mentioning todays game 😁

Used to love ABC but with Chappell its hard to enjoy now. Even the younger nein boys club didn't bring up their careers as much as he does. Was talking about hardness yesterday and it was cringe. He felt the need to point out they didn't wear helmets so makes them harder like the current guys have a choice or that it's a lot better for ones well being to wear a helmet, doesn't make them less 'hard'.
 
There's a difference between an outside edge against a ball that's swinging and whatever went through Wade's head. The ball was doing nothing, Australia was in a commanding position, and he let them back in.

He also played similarly dumb shots twice already in the series.
Rubbish, I expect that every single pull shot from a ball outside off is from now on deemed a rubbish shot from you, or just maybe... It's a hindsight call because he got out to it.

the ball hits an inch lower on Wades bat it probably goes for four and not a single person says anything.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top