Free Agent # 6: Joe Daniher - derp Brisbane player

[Fin ice Smuggler]

Did someone say gws

Surely they enquire if Joe is interested?

 

[11kgm]

Caldwell + O Halloran and first for Daniher and a second

 

[Lore]

Silvagni talking about Papley at about 9 minutes:

Stephen Silvagni on SEN Breakfast (21/10/20)

Stephen Silvagni joins Garry and Tim for an expolsive interview on his time at Carlton, what he'd do with their list and a whole range of other issues.

player.whooshkaa.com

A lot of what he's saying honestly sounds like he's talking about Joe lol. He might not be, but it's very transferable.

 

[DERO]

Silvagni talking about Papley at about 9 minutes:

Stephen Silvagni on SEN Breakfast (21/10/20)

Stephen Silvagni joins Garry and Tim for an expolsive interview on his time at Carlton, what he'd do with their list and a whole range of other issues.

player.whooshkaa.com

A lot of what he's saying honestly sounds like he's talking about Joe lol. He might not be, but it's very transferable.

Cliffs?

 

[DERO]

SO PICK 9 WAS NEVER ON THE TABLE FOR DANIHER

 

[jmoo wan]

SO PICK 9 WAS NEVER ON THE TABLE FOR DANIHER

no, but it would have been as soon as we traded him

 

[Lore]

Cliffs?

Something along the lines of how hard it is to get a contracted player out of a club at short notice and how they need time to find other options etc. etc.

 

[DERO]

Something along the lines of how hard it is to get a contracted player out of a club at short notice and how they need time to find other options etc. etc.

I ended up listening from start to finish because it was fascinating. SOS was really open.

 

[Lore]

I ended up listening from start to finish because it was fascinating. SOS was really open.

Yeah haha. Carlton folks don't like it so much

 

[DERO]

Yeah haha. Carlton folks don't like it so much

Loved it! Some really good insights.

 

[11kgm]

Wouldn't mind SOS h ere

 

[yodellinhank]

SO PICK 9 WAS NEVER ON THE TABLE FOR DANIHER

Confirmed never, he didn't even nominate the blues.

 

[DERO]

Confirmed never, he didn't even nominate the blues.

Sack Dodoro.

 

[TheGreatBarryB]

Thought they said last year that Papley would’ve been at Blues if Daniher deal was done? If so then surely pick 9 would’ve been part of that deal

 

[DERO]

Thought they said last year that Papley would’ve been at Blues if Daniher deal was done? If so then surely pick 9 would’ve been part of that deal

SOS said that they made a very attractive offer to Sydney and Papley was not traded... seemingly because he still had 2-3 years left on his contract.

The Daniher trade and the Papley trade appear to be two separate transactions.

 

[Bunk Moreland]

I prefer the version where we directly cost them Papley

 

[ant555]

SO PICK 9 WAS NEVER ON THE TABLE FOR DANIHER

I am shocked ....oh wait a minute. I actually am not

 

[Kakkle]

Isn't half the appeal of getting Daniher is that they could get him with out having to give up draft picks and only salary? If I was Brisbane, I'd tell the club to * off, either match or don't, but we ain't trading, and we'll take him in the PSD, if he decides to walk. Brisbane don't owe us any favours.

 

[Keystone agony]

Isn't half the appeal of getting Daniher is that they could get him with out having to give up draft picks and only salary? If I was Brisbane, I'd tell the club to fu** off, either match or don't, but we ain't trading, and we'll take him in the PSD, if he decides to walk. Brisbane don't owe us any favours.

Potentially but what favours do Stkilda owe the crows?

It's good business in the end

We'd need to scratch their back for sure, how we can do that I'm not sure?

Witherden, M.Adams, Ely Smyth, R.Lester, 3 way trade? There would be options

The other problem to what you say is if he goes in PSD then potentially neither club benefits as the swans would likely pounce early.

Instead of making neither benefit, why not find a way to make both benefit

 

[ant555]

Thought they said last year that Papley would’ve been at Blues if Daniher deal was done? If so then surely pick 9 would’ve been part of that deal

So how far of the mark was I ?

 

[TheGreatBarryB]

So how far of the mark was I ?

Not sure as it still doesn’t make sense. Yesterday’s news I guess

 

[DERO]

Isn't half the appeal of getting Daniher is that they could get him with out having to give up draft picks and only salary? If I was Brisbane, I'd tell the club to fu** off, either match or don't, but we ain't trading, and we'll take him in the PSD, if he decides to walk. Brisbane don't owe us any favours.

A win/ win if possible is always going to be a better option for the sake of future negotiations. It is good business.

 

[ant555]

Not sure as it still doesn’t make sense. Yesterday’s news I guess

Made perfect sense. Swans where not dealing Papley. I said all along that Sydney where not actually chasing Daniher 100%. Happy to get him for a cheap deal but never really going hard to do it. In the same way we where not going to trade either.

 

[ant555]

A win/ win if possible is always going to be a better option for the sake of future negotiations. It is good business.

It is but we are talking football clubs.

 

[DERO]

It is but we are talking football clubs.

Same rules apply I think. That said, a professional big-picture approach is probably a bit too much to ask for.