Moderator
#5,276
I thought that was for any extra cash they might get, but at the end of the day I don't think Joe or the AFL would let people literally pay the fine for him. Giving it to charity on his behalf sort of softens the blow I suppose, money that otherwise wouldn't have gone to charity will now as a result of the rough conduct. I like the first two ideas more than the club's debt though. There isn't a lot of warm and fuzzies about paying down debt. 

