Not for mine. He's either a stopper or he doesn't play. We have much better midfield talent incoming, he can play a role but he's way back. Reckon will be delisted as per Bread McKenzie who many raved about.
My point, though, is that when he is a stopper (which, imo, is needed in most games) he makes us better. When he completely shuts down the oppositions best mid it improves our chances of winning the game of footy.
I actually agree that he should only be ever played as a midfield tagger, but I think that he should be played in that role whenever he is fit.
I seem to recall we've always held opposing opinions on BJ. I'll concede that I've moved more towards your view than vice versa, but I haven't changed my opinion enough to call him best 22 and I don't buy the "he makes us better" line. Except where a hard lockdown is required - when not, he's never done anything that makes me think he holds a spot on non-tagging merit.
Haha yeah, I think we have, actually.
At the risk of re-treading old ground (particularly in the Taylor Garner thread), I'll just say that I actually understand where you're coming from, but I think he should be played in that stopper role whenever he is fit, as having a player in that role makes us better imo.