ManWithNoName
TheBrownDog
Okay.What standards? Getting a game at 23 years of age after being in the system for 5 years.
Everyone's wrong and you're right.
You're the hero Gotham deserves.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Okay.What standards? Getting a game at 23 years of age after being in the system for 5 years.
Okay.
Everyone's wrong and you're right.
You're the hero Gotham deserves.
Will he be picked up by another club?
good bloke, good family, great attitudeMy issue is with the way selection of players for us has become, at best, about first come first serve.
The young players have generally been held to a standard for selection that hardly any of the incumbent best 22 players would have gotten close to meeting during the period in which they have played their 70 to 100 games largely unchallenged at the selection table.
What was noticeable from early on last year was that Aylett was fearless in terms of his attack on the ball and a manic tackler. We knew from his ability to smoke anyone other than Rayner and Ambrose in a time trail that he can seriously run and he seemed to translate that into ground covered on field (where he has a better turn of pace than Ambrose does).
When I look at his form throughout 2014 and the defensive discipline he displayed it's very hard to reconcile it with his demotion and I doubt that it is about more than his being on the list a year too late and Hird not being around last year (giving Hird the credit of consistently applying his obsession with players with Aylett's work rate).
The opportunity to develop his raw attributes, which are far greater than some of the players we have chosen over him, was ours and given his age likely to be ours alone but we seem to have chose not to take it.
I don't see why another club would bother drafting him, he will be 24 and is not the sort of player that clubs are going to look to develop given that it is important to continually turn players on a list over to keep the age profile balanced. It doesn't mean that he can't play. All it really means is that he was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
I spoke to him at the sponsor night. He is indeed a great bloke and I left that really hoping he could pick himself up off the canvas.good bloke, good family, great attitude
i hope he makes it off the rookie list
it sounds like the cliche 'he barracked for Essendon as a kid' but i think his family are pretty dyed in the wool bombers, they hail from nearby in the RiverinaI spoke to him at the sponsor night. He is indeed a great bloke and I left that really hoping he could pick himself up off the canvas.
I still don't really understand why he was demoted and it means he faces an uphill battle to make it.
I think it was a case of being the steak knives in the Edwards pick up that he was never really going to be a long term prospect unless he showed that he was undroppable when he came in. I guess when your die is already cast before you even play a game for the new club, it makes it inevitable. Sometimes, very good players just don't make it due to circumstances out of their control and I think this is what is happening here.I spoke to him at the sponsor night. He is indeed a great bloke and I left that really hoping he could pick himself up off the canvas.
I still don't really understand why he was demoted and it means he faces an uphill battle to make it.
Is there anyone we can chuck on the LTI now so we can give this guy a couple of runs before the end of the year. Might as well give all the rookies a go at senior level given the seasons a write-off and who knows - we just might unearth another Peverill....