You wanted Hill as well back in 2019.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
You wanted Hill as well back in 2019.....
So did I, but I underestimated his softness.You wanted Hill as well back in 2019.....
No problems with him as a player back then...................but it looks like I need to wheel this out again....................
"Context is worth 80 I.Q. points" - Alan Kay
If you don't have a 150+ I.Q. (and you don't), then don't waste your time trying to upstage me, because you will only come off looking like a goose.
Just because you don't care what others think of you doesn't make it right to pot them. Is it not plainly obvious?I want you to really understand that I honestly do not care what you or the rest of "The Heathers" think of me.
In light of this fact, any further wastage of bandwidth just constitutes acts of virtue signaling on your own behalf, aimed at the lowest common denominator.
Just because you don't care what others think of you doesn't make it right to pot them. Is it not plainly obvious?
Meanwhile.....................
Scott is looking to make himself a permanent part of the Roos’ best 22, and believes confidence is key to achieving his goals.
He was a standout at the start of his first year in 2019, earning a NAB Rising Star nomination, but injuries and form curtailed his progress.
Bouncing back in 2020, the hard-running wingman played the last 12 games and continued his improvement.
Now, going forward, he’s determined not to neglect improving on the strongest aspects of his game.
“I want to develop more confidence to bring out further parts of what my football looks like and become an important player in the AFL side this year,” Scott said.
I think it's more a matter of "context adds 80 IQ points". By just screenshotting (not actually quoting or replying) somebody's comment you not only remove all context, but actively seek to obfuscate the original post by removing the capacity of the reader to easily refer back to the post in its original context.Ok, after all this are we saying that it is "not ok" to refer to something previously written?
Is there a max time period that comments on previous posts are open to be replied to?
Ok, after all this are we saying that it is "not ok" to refer to something previously written?
Is there a max time period that comments on previous posts are open to be replied to?
I think it's more a matter of "context adds 80 IQ points". By just screenshotting (not actually quoting or replying) somebody's comment you not only remove all context, but actively seek to obfuscate the original post by removing the capacity of the reader to easily refer back to the post in its original context.
I think he forgot the decimal point before the 5.such a high IQ and you’re on here non stop with nearly 80k posts dispelling that notion.
Yep, and also ended up hitting the scoreboard too.Jacobs did the same. Was a pure negater and then he built up his average disposal numbers.
Ultimate complement really.Classy from Ratten to have a go at a 20yo.
It helped LMac gain confidence last yearThink he’s got more in him than to be a negator, but if it’s used as lessons on how to run attacking lines for a season can’t be too upset.
Whitfield one of the best two way outside players in the game and Scott will have to work his arse off to stop him.