Past #8: Nathan Hrovat - won't be offered a new contract - thanks Rat

[Groin guru]

Bin.

Slow. Zero physicality. Yes his disposal is tidy but it's a luxary we can't afford at the moment. We carry a lot of low disposal getters that don't trouble the score board all that often. Having a midget that is slower than Cunnington, can't mark, doesn't kick goals, low on the pressure end, and doesn't have the biggest tank = disaster.

He is the personification of a player you use if you want to finish mid table. I'd rather play Wright back and push JMac to half forward than play Hrovat.

 

[see see]

Not an AFL standard footballer.

So weak in the contest. Why is a player who is clearly going to be delisted at season's end getting a game ahead of the likes of LDU or Taylor?

 

[showusyacunningt]

Was ok tonight. Had some nice touches which led to score opportunities. Not arguing for his long term viability, but he wasn't our worst out there.

 

[roos_fanatic08]

Not an AFL standard footballer.

So weak in the contest. Why is a player who is clearly going to be delisted at season's end getting a game ahead of the likes of LDU or Taylor?

Should have been paid out last year. Unbelieveable that he got to continue his career at the expense of Hibberd or Mountford.

 

[Themanbun]

Was ok tonight. Had some nice touches which led to score opportunities. Not arguing for his long term viability, but he wasn't our worst out there.

Daniel Rich burning him off through the middle did him no favours. But I agree, some of his mistakes own way out of proportion.

 

[the big lebowski]

Not his fault he ain’t good enough. Garner or Walker would b infront of him if things had gone another way.

Probably would have just played the extra mid in LDU even.

 

[chairo]

Was just ineffective tonight. I'm sure there will be those who defend him but in my eyes was the worst player on for both teams. I just can't see this selection.

 

[Roosurgence]

Everyone called it. Just not AFL standard.

Should be the last time we see him in a North Melbourne jumper.

 

[Waynesworld]

Was ok tonight. Had some nice touches which led to score opportunities. Not arguing for his long term viability, but he wasn't our worst out there.

Did he play tonight???

Must have been hiding under a sprinkler as I didn't see him.

 

[Billy Not Really]

G.O.N.E. Gone.

VFL standard at best, seeya later Rat.

 

[king rising]

Just a really poor excuse for a footballer. End of story

 

[Snake_Baker]

Amazing. How the * can you focus on this crap already after that disgrace tonight?

I'm convinced some people hate certain players more then they like the club.

 

[Roosurgence]

Amazing. How the fu** can you focus on this crap already after that disgrace tonight?

I'm convinced some people hate certain players more then they like the club.

Him being non existent is one of the reasons we lost.

He is s**t, how hard is that to comprehend.

 

[Uncle_Leo]

Goodbye Nathan, you didn’t cost much and haven’t provided much.

Thanks for your time.

 

[Waynesworld]

Amazing. How the fu** can you focus on this crap already after that disgrace tonight?

I'm convinced some people hate certain players more then they like the club.

I'm waiting to see what his game time was tonight. It must have been something like 5% TOG for the amount of impact he had.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Him being non existent is one of the reasons we lost.

He is s**t, how hard is that to comprehend.

I just don't know how you can focus on this s**t straight after that outrageous match.

You and a few others are certifiably obsessed with hatred. You're seriously not well.

 

[Roosurgence]

Amazing. How the fu** can you focus on this crap already after that disgrace tonight?

I'm convinced some people hate certain players more then they like the club.

Next you will be telling me that Hitler was a great bloke.

I think you secretly get a kick out of defending the indefensible.

 

[Reagan Smash]

The whole team was invisible in the third and people are picking out Hrovat

 

[Roosurgence]

The whole team was invisible in the third and people are picking out Hrovat

Yes because he was invisible for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th.

 

[Snake_Baker]

Next you will be telling me that Hitler was a great bloke.

I think you secretly get a kick out of defending the indefensible.

You're not primarily a North supporter mate. You are first and foremost, a Nathan Hrovat hater. This doesn't have anything to do with him playing badly either, it's the fact you make THIS the focus of your attention after our team was certifiably RAPED tonight.

There's something very, VERY wrong with you.

 

[Horizons_00]

11 disposals, one tackle and 0 goals

I agree he wasn’t the reason we lost but * me he offers us SFA week in week out. Can’t even remember the last time he played well hahaha

 

[Snake_Baker]

11 disposals, one tackle and 0 goals

I agree he wasn’t the reason we lost but fu** me he offers us SFA week in week out. Can’t even remember the last time he played well hahaha

Was pretty much a non contributor tonight, but if this is seriously the prime focus of your anger tonight, then you need to visit a shrink also.

 

[groo]

Was pretty much a non contributor tonight, but if this is seriously the prime focus of your anger tonight, then you need to visit a shrink also.

He contributed in Daniel rich goal assists.

 

[Horizons_00]

Was pretty much a non contributor tonight, but if this is seriously the prime focus of your anger tonight, then you need to visit a shrink also.

Absolutely not mate, there is a lot about tonight’s game that made my blood boil lol

But the facts don’t lie, we need to replace him

 

[Snake_Baker]

Absolutely not mate, there is a lot about tonight’s game that made my blood boil lol

But the facts don’t lie, we need to replace him

It's not looking good for him, but pardon me if there's a few other things on my mind at the moment.