-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Conspiracy Theory 9/11 - Part 2
- Thread starter exe ex machina
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
- Banned
- #4,352
I realise you're pretty worked up about this one point. It's almost like it's your last resort.
Read over the case of Quick v NIST and you'll understand their reasoning, it's not like they're trying to hide.
Here's an insert from a Judge...
"Reduced to layman's terms, the difference between the information that was released and the information that was withheld is that the released data files contain structural models based on information generally available to building designers and engineers, whereas the withheld data files contain information that could be used to predict the collapse of a building and, if made available to a person with the appropriate level of expertise, would provide instruction to individuals wanting to learn how to simulate building collapses and how to most effectively destroy large buildings."
Now, how'd you go with the Pentagon plane debris, any luck?
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
- Banned
- #4,353
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Based on the wikipedia link.
- Hard Core: The organizers and active members of the various 9/11 Truth Movement organizations. They produce the information, spot the anomalies and technical inconsistencies, provide the technical base and form the theories. While they claim to be only interested in facts and to use scientific method, they commit the logical fallacy of ‘confirmation bias’ by pre-determining the outcome, then searching for corroborating evidence while ignoring the vast body of peer-reviewed, independent, consensual research which contradict their theories. They supply the physical structure of the movement by organizing events, seminars, discussions, marches and distributing flyers and pamphlets. Their numbers are relatively small but they are tight-knit and highly connected. Their worldview favors ‘super-conspiracy’, a master plan that is behind conspiracies which they believe they are uncovering.[227]
- Aug 29, 2013
- 3,091
- 2,039
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Seriously Ablett - how many Shills are out there by your estimate?
Now everyone who works at Wikipedia are paid shills, and therefore to run with this logic, know 9/11 was an inside job, but are keeping quiet about the truth because they're being paid to do so?
How many thousands (millions?) must know "the truth" but wont reveal it??
- Banned
- #4,359
Not all shills but 90% of American media is owned by 6 corporations all with very shady histories.
The 'millions' just assume if they read or hear something in BIG media then that's what happened. The masses are far to easily feared and controlled.
Then again... Most are more worried about getting the latest iPhone than what's really happening in the world.
repost, watch it.
- Mar 16, 2002
- 25,005
- 16,824
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond
- Oct 20, 2014
- 20,812
- 23,506
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
Yeah, I read that Wiki crap as well a few days ago!
Good response , demonstrating your confirmation bias.
However that's not how Wikipedia works, its merely a compilation of information from other sources.
such as this.
http://www.csicop.org/si/show/a_bestiary_of_the_9_11_truth_movement_notes_from_the_front_line
It's Ablett's fantasy - so if he wants it to be a big one then why not have millions in on it.
One of the biggest problems with the 9/11 conspiracies is the risk and reward of doing it
The reward: an extremely expensive series of wars
Now the risk if it came out the next day the US government and CIA did it:
American civil war - military likely to defect - CIA and government officials massacred
Now your the US president and your plan relies on thousands of people keeping quite or the plan not failing in any other way would you take the risk?
The reward: an extremely expensive series of wars
Now the risk if it came out the next day the US government and CIA did it:
American civil war - military likely to defect - CIA and government officials massacred
Now your the US president and your plan relies on thousands of people keeping quite or the plan not failing in any other way would you take the risk?
- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,485
- 58,749
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
It's like deja vu
- Mar 16, 2002
- 25,005
- 16,824
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond
- Oct 16, 2009
- 11,164
- 9,363
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Can only dream of being this good
- Banned
- #4,369
Shill reporting for duty 
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Banned
- #4,370
It was the perfectly round exit hole that made me chuckle.
I can just imagine you walking around chuckling at things the rest of us find mundane.
- Banned
- #4,372
You can imagine !? GTFO
Your reply let you down
I didn't say i could imagine "everything". Some things need to be grounded in reality. And if you require too much imagination to put your point of view across its no more credible than Star Wars.
One wing hit the ground; the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load-bearing columns. What little was left would then be dragged in with the rest of the plane
- Dec 16, 2010
- 1,413
- 1,852
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Liverpool
"Mr Bush, we have successfully guided two planes into the WTC and detonation will commence soon"
Bush: "Excellent, how long until the next plane hits the Pentagon"
"ahh sir, we forgot to get another plane"
Bush: "What??"
"It's okay sir, we will just fire a missile at it, nobody will notice"
Bush: "excellent"
Yeah nah
- Status