- Jul 28, 2012
- 11,077
- 10,428
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- QPR, Buffalo Bills
Insanity! Release the wild bulls half way through the final QTR....? A goal is worth 6 points, just kick more of them and you win!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Any team would prefer their opponent have a kick in than a centre bounce. The team defending the kick in generally outscores the team kicking it in.Could achieve the same by giving 3 points for a kicked ‘point’ (not rushed etc) perhaps the ball goes back to centre after
Flood buster. No one uses the term flood but it’s as present as it always was
I wonder why Geelong and Sydney are so successful in kicking out? Do they play a certain way? Or is it personnel? Just small sample size, not statistically significant?Any team would prefer their opponent have a kick in than a centre bounce. The team defending the kick in generally outscores the team kicking it in.View attachment 1202473
More speculative shots would be encouraged by reverting kick ins to the old rules.
after every goal you dont mess with the zohan disco break
They are just better at it than other teams. The fact they are positive isn't really that telling except for the fact that the mean is close enough to zero and variance sufficient to mean better teams can be positive. The mean is clearly below zero though which shows its easier to score from defending a kick in, than from taking a kick in - which makes sense because it is by far the smallest of the three basic sources (turnovers, stoppages, kick ins).I wonder why Geelong and Sydney are so successful in kicking out? Do they play a certain way? Or is it personnel? Just small sample size, not statistically significant?
M U L T I B A L L