Eh. Ollie wasn't good tonight!If ollie isnt captain next year ill spew
Needs to switch himself on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Eh. Ollie wasn't good tonight!If ollie isnt captain next year ill spew
Yep Ollie was taken to the cleaners by Priddis.Eh. Ollie wasn't good tonight!
Needs to switch himself on.
Totally agree with the composure comment. Fits in well with Ken's 'try hard' mantra.I had a great post for it too.
No composure when it really mattered.
Oh well.
And we've been gifting him games ever since.You're welcome to take him off our hands for free. Apparently Hinkley and Parker thought he would be a better player than Matt Crouch.
Why not both!Right in front of you?
Nah we ****** up.
2 hours later and I still hate this football club.
Get rid of everyone that played in the 07 grand final please. Chop off the deadwood.
It's pretty much just Boak and Hoff. Think our problems run deeper than that.
Would've likely given Ryder the chop out he needed and would've beaten Petrie in ruck, and likely would've been able to be a little more competitive against McGovern who took 15 marks.
There's zero doubt not bringing in Trengove was a mistake.
Both champs, too.Based on what? The last two blokes Trengove tried to play a defensive role on were Alex Rance and Jake Carlisle and they were both arguably BOG for their clubs on the night.
Trengove certainly wouldn't have offered the defensive pressure or the quick hands in scoring chains that Marshall gave us tonight.
Even by West Coast standards, their intercept marking was sky high. No doubt many of those easy pick offs could have been brought to ground by the bigger, stronger body of Trengove. It's hard to tell if that would have made up for the better offensive work of Marshall but it's a perfectly legitimate discussion point.
Such as?One thing Trengove could have really helped with is the rucking.
But as a forward hell no. There were so many things out there that Marshall did that Trengove would never be able to do.
I can't help but think that we'll be a very dangerous side to come up against for at least the next couple seasons.God just wish Marshall had another 5 til 10 kg of muscle . Him and dixon could be very scary . Which is why i think there ok with jacko going
I had a great post for it too.
No composure when it really mattered.
Oh well.
Would've likely given Ryder the chop out he needed and would've beaten Petrie in ruck, and likely would've been able to be a little more competitive against McGovern who took 15 marks.
There's zero doubt not bringing in Trengove was a mistake.
The other thing to remember is that we never brought our A game last night.
The other three finals involved a team that dominated by playing at their best when it counted.
Our best, with leaders and stars all playing well from the start, and with players lowering their eyes going forward and converting their chances for goal, should have been enough for a 5-7 goal win. Yet as is always the case against WCE, we didn't come to play or bring our best quality of footy from the first siren.
In retrospect we were so far off the form and quality of the three winning finalists (Adel, Syd and Rich), that we should thank our lucky stars to be put out of misery early in the finals campaign, and thereby avoid a 72 point spanking in an MCG prelim.