It is interesting that you seem to think that the last 8 years have no bearing on the circumstances and perceptions of current events ... that once someone is out of power their deeds are irrelevent and their legacies immaterial? Historically and politically let alone socially and economically that makes no sense. The reason we have a Godwin's law is because people are still allowing for the effects of someone who has been dead over 70 years.
In any case you gave a statement that included your subjective opinion (seeming / genuinely comes accross) - that you perceive his actions to be agaist the separation of powers, anti constitutional, and thinks he can do what he likes because he is the president.
I pointed out that those exact same subjective feelings have been being held by the other side about Obama for the last eight years - and that they, now, perceive Trump to be seeking to restore the balance of those powers, fighting for the constitution, and doing his best to bring the country back from the precipice they perceive it was about to walk over or at least to give it a decent crack.
Who is right or wrong - difficult to say at this point - but subjective opinion cannot (ok should not) be used to justify judgements of reality or declarations of objective truth. Different people see him as insane, brilliant, literally Hitler, Lincoln reborn, Sulla trying to save the republic, Agustus planning on taking on the Imperial mantle, clown, racist, bigotted, even handed, loyal, trecherous, hard working, driven etc etc etc and of course he cannot be all of those things.
When we try to understand where he is coming from we cannot just wipe out of the equation the circumstances leading up to it. There is nothing inherently evil in pointing out the hypocricy of people who cheered when their guy did something and jeer when the other guy does the same thing - or poiting it out on both sides (eg the concentration camps that Clinton ... and Bush ... and Obama ... and Trump were/are all going to build to control their enemies and stay in power)
Independent of the debate the specific EO/judicail rulings - I don't think it is irrelevent to point out how the same people who are up in arms over temporary travel bans while mechanisms are put into place for extreme vetting when put there by Trump were perfectly happy with extreme vettings when instituted by Obama ... or when the same group of countries are banned by a range of other countries (incluing muslim Kuwait) ... or how people who seem to be fine with countries permenantly banning Jewish visitors suddenly want to defend the poor muslims (who are the ones banning the Jews mostly) ... or when people consider riot/burn/batter/break/spew racist hate/throw rocks as legitimate expressions of opinion when done by one side and consider attempting to express a contrary opinion to their own to be violence ...