Hearing the Lions are a bit upset that Shadeau Brain is not eligible for them as has not been in the region continuously for 5 years. Anyone have anything on him?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 7
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Only from google. There’s a CM article.Hearing the Lions are a bit upset that Shadeau Brain is not eligible for them as has not been in the region continuously for 5 years. Anyone have anything on him?
I always liked the college bball brothers from the 90’s, Scientific Mapp and Geography Mapp.That name is NFL-worthy. I mean it's no Equanimeous St.Brown or Rock Ya-Sin, but still...
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Hearing the Lions are a bit upset that Shadeau Brain is not eligible for them as has not been in the region continuously for 5 years. Anyone have anything on him?
Can you just stop with the insults.If they rated him so highly why did the coaches wait so long to include him in the academy side? Nor did they include him in the final 35 squad. If they were under the impression lions couldnt control him, why did they end up selecting him is teams anyway? Because its a reactionary shit show, run by an under qualified, self important pack of morons.
Below a previous post of yours. He wasnt in your 'top 3 who werent getting a game' either..
Its my opinion, and whats stopping them defending themselves?Can you just stop with the insults.
Especially against people who can’t defend themselves on here.
No problem with posters expressing their opinions otherwise.
They’re not on here.Its my opinion, and whats stopping them defending themselves?
.
Let's face it, if they were on here defending themselves, you'd be criticizing them for wasting time posting on a footy forum when they more important things to do.Its my opinion, and whats stopping them defending themselves?
.
Lions actually competing well with a previously hot Swans side. The swans dont have all their ins.. (8 out) Hugely different Lions side on the park compared to the boys in the 1st few games. Many now included, some from outside the 35 who should have been playing from the start. Ignored for weeks until QAFL clubs started campaigning for them to be included.
So instead of playing intra academy games and sorting these boys out, many of these boys who should have got a a full 7-8 game series to show their wares, now only have 2-3 games. Just disgraceful. Pathetic coaching and selection process.
Cry me a river.
How did it end up?Lions actually competing well with a previously hot Swans side. The swans dont have all their ins.. (8 out) Hugely different Lions side on the park compared to the boys in the 1st few games. Many now included, some from outside the 35 who should have been playing from the start. Ignored for weeks until QAFL clubs started campaigning for them to be included.
So instead of playing intra academy games and sorting these boys out, many of these boys who should have got a a full 7-8 game series to show their wares, now only have 2-3 games. Just disgraceful. Pathetic coaching and selection process.
Pretty sure the 3 Quigley suggested plus Brain played today. Lions won 54-64 i think. Dour game as one would expect.How did it end up?
Who are some of these guys that have been brought in and are making a difference?
I know Quigley (I think) was excited about a kid named MacMillan?
Also was there a young tall who kicked a few goals in a match a couple games ago?
BTW I don't think there has been anyone on here arguing that the Academy is doing well. I think we are all pretty confused and disappointed that the academy kids just are not presenting in the last few years.
I've asked you to declare your relationship to the Academy, but you have repeatedly failed to address it. I gather you don't deny your previous accounts of Tigernova, covertackle and Billyclub plus probably a few others over the years. I assumed that you have a family member who is/was an Academy member. Am I wrong? That's what I mean by "vested interest" and I'm pretty sure you know that. But I tell you what, I'll address the points you offer up if you address that.Obviously you dont understand 'vested interest'. And anyway, tell me how accurate the observations would be of those with no interest? About as accurate as the ones you have offered.. zero, none, nothing, nada.
Why cant any of you just address these points?
NoDid the 17’s win today?
Are you really criticising the guy because he has a vested interest in the academy to do well? The academy haven't produced much talent since it's inception are supporters supposed to just shrug their shoulders?Let's face it, if they were on here defending themselves, you'd be criticizing them for wasting time posting on a footy forum when they more important things to do.
But kudos to you, it's classic Tigernova or whatever the mutitude of usernames you've had over the years were. The shame of it all is the workings academy is worth debating, but it's hard to take you seriously when you've got a vested interest.
Nobody has a problem with him wanting the academy to do well, everybody wants that. It’s the name calling and childish way he’s been going about it, even if the academy were to do exactly what he’s asking for he would still find a way to turn it into a bad thing.Are you really criticising the guy because he has a vested interest in the academy to do well? The academy haven't produced much talent since it's inception are supporters supposed to just shrug their shoulders?
Those are two separate questions. The former can imply a level of bias, e.g. hypothetically if his kid isn't getting the recognition he thinks he deserves - and it also seems to result in him getting aggro at anyone with a differing opinion or trying to have a level-headed discussion. As to the latter yes, as TFB says in the very post you quoted, "the workings academy is worth debating".Are you really criticising the guy because he has a vested interest in the academy to do well? The academy haven't produced much talent since it's inception are supporters supposed to just shrug their shoulders?
There's always going to be people unhappy, thinking that their kid didn't get the look-in they thought they should have. I totally get that. I know people whose lad didn't even get a look in in the Academy program who were probably deserving - they can at least debate the pros and cons of the operation of the Academy with a level head. No, it's because he this poster has a history of bagging the academy when friends/family don't get the attention he thinks they deserve.Are you really criticising the guy because he has a vested interest in the academy to do well? The academy haven't produced much talent since it's inception are supporters supposed to just shrug their shoulders?
Very much this. And I'll restate that I'd wager none of us on here have the credentials to know how complicated the job actually is.A lot of people have been very critical of the academy (myself included) and the results have not been as good as expected and as they should be. I doubt anyone on here has any problem with people fairly criticising the Academy. The issue I think is the continual pointless name-calling and the fact that many of the criticisms of approach could actually be positives or at least acknowledgements that they got things wrong and attempts to rectify the situation. Being willing to try others who step up is not necessarily an acknowledgement that the original process was wrong. It may be but not necessarily so and in any case being willing to move on from past decisions should be applauded provided lessons are learned where appropriate.
Thanks for quoting my poor grammar. Prick.As to the latter yes, as TFB says in the very post you quoted, "the workings academy is worth debating".
If you arent going to give a kid a run, dont put them in a 'final squad' of 35, then pick players from outside the squad in front of them repeatedly. Just tell the kid to save his money and travel time etc. Dont ignore him for weeks and continually disappoint him.Those are two separate questions. The former can imply a level of bias, e.g. hypothetically if his kid isn't getting the recognition he thinks he deserves - and it also seems to result in him getting aggro at anyone with a differing opinion or trying to have a level-headed discussion. As to the latter yes, as TFB says in the very post you quoted, "the workings academy is worth debating".