Adcock or Griffen

[Benno From Berwick]

Who had the better year?

 

[Benno From Berwick]

100% for Griff so far!!

 

[Lenny*]

Not anymore.

Key word "Year".

 

[Pie 4 Life]

Griffen by a mile.

 

[sunbkangas]

The key is the word year...

Griffen's Year Vs Adcock's year.

Griffen a total standout.

 

[Top Dog]

Griffen = All class, superior disposal on either foot to any other first year player & future captain.

Adcock = Good player. Not in Griffen's league though. Will be a good 150+ game player for then Lions.

Griffen has been sensational this year. Remember, he didnt even run until well after christmas last year. Give him a pre-season and he is going to explode in the middle come 2006.

I cant wait.

 

[Heisenberg_]

Groffen no doubt will be the better player, but Adcock had a better year played every game without blaying any real bad ones

 

[Bartram_Class]

Whos Adcock?

 

[m.diddy]

Not KB's mate.

 

[Hollow Knight]

Living in London I havent seen any Bulldogs games but from what I have heard, Griffen had a sensational year.

I will also say though that backline players never get the respect they deserve and Adcock certainly took some big scalps this year.

 

[The Dice Man]

LMFAO @ Benno's insecurities.

KB owns you!

 

[The_Flying_Egg]

It seems to generally be Richmond supporters saying Adcock. Wonder why that is?

 

[konstas_87]

it's way harder to impress playing back pocket, u can't cut up the middle with big quick runs to 50m and goal. he stopped the best small forward several times this year, i reckon adcock was great for us.
deledio very far ahead nonetheless.