Small travelling support base and limited SA based membership I'd say. Also not really a drawing team like Pie/Dons/Geelong.Yep. I mentioned this before the game! A little surprised though by the small crowd. What's that about?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Small travelling support base and limited SA based membership I'd say. Also not really a drawing team like Pie/Dons/Geelong.Yep. I mentioned this before the game! A little surprised though by the small crowd. What's that about?
11 months is a fair bit, and the game played is deceptive for comparing ages because for a couple years GWS were pretty much fielding an under 21 side with players getting many more games than they would in any other teamWas surprised by the age breakdown of the teams. Generally think GWS as a super young side, but we're not far off them.
View attachment 251572
To me this says the AFC and SMA can bank on 44,000-45,000 AFC fans when having a good year. The Riverbank stand had empty pockets left and right , up the top corners. I noticed there would have been 8? GWS flags in the opposition bay at the other end of the ground. Yet GWS to me will be the most exciting team to watch from a football purist POVSmall travelling support base and limited SA based membership I'd say. Also not really a drawing team like Pie/Dons/Geelong.
Their supporter base have not grasped the AFL carrot. It's all abut the A league. If they could harness that level of support the Giants would be a significant force in the AFL.To me this says the AFC and SMA can bank on 44,000-45,000 AFC fans when having a good year. The Riverbank stand had empty pockets left and right , up the top corners. I noticed there would have been 8? GWS flags in the opposition bay at the other end of the ground. Yet GWS to me will be the most exciting team to watch from a football purist POV
Seemed to be mixing up his taps a bit.Very surprised Jacobs not mentioned in the best players. I thought his ruck work was exceptional.
He had a few really clever and deft flicks over his head to Thommo and Sloane, was really mixing it up and I imagine his work was a huge part of the reason the mids performed so well.Seemed to be mixing up his taps a bit.
Hitting in different directions and also jumping at the ball rather than 3 weeks early. Well done, Doc! Must have done a ruck work session at training this week. Was long overdue.
Guys like Stevie J are perfect for him to match up on.Cheney was though
Further to this a really good breakdown of age profiles i on the footy stats blot The Arc - https://thearcfooty.com/2016/04/25/how-does-your-clubs-age-profile-compare/Was surprised by the age breakdown of the teams. Generally think GWS as a super young side, but we're not far off them.
View attachment 251572
We have the smoothest distribution of all which means we are best teamFurther to this a really good breakdown of age profiles i on the footy stats blot The Arc - https://thearcfooty.com/2016/04/25/how-does-your-clubs-age-profile-compare/
View attachment 251608
Further to this a really good breakdown of age profiles i on the footy stats blot The Arc - https://thearcfooty.com/2016/04/25/how-does-your-clubs-age-profile-compare/
View attachment 251608
I think we can all agree that Charlie Cameron looks good in the number 23.
Yep - the midfield is where he has to beDefinitely needs more time in the middle. He can get a bit lost up forward sometimes, especially when we're not getting it in there too often, as has been the case for a lot of this year. But he really adds some spark and pace around the ball. Brings a different look to a midfield that otherwise has a few too many similar types.
Generally though there is a high correlation - except for GWS and GC who had to play the kids for a couple years.In my opinion age doesn't really matter. It's all about games played.
That's what I took from itWe have the smoothest distribution of all which means we are best team
The most average team in the AFL. Vanilla even.We have the smoothest distribution of all which means we are best team
Good thing we dropped Tex like some posters were advocating
Further to this a really good breakdown of age profiles i on the footy stats blot The Arc - https://thearcfooty.com/2016/04/25/how-does-your-clubs-age-profile-compare/
View attachment 251608
"The Bulldogs are frighteningly young"
- So are Port
And North!