Game Day Adelaide Crows vs Ice Bath Police (North Division) at Adelaide Oval

Remove this Banner Ad

crowker

Senior List
Jul 11, 2014
244
312
AFL Club
Adelaide
What a champion Ben Cunnington , top effort
 

morris086

Club Legend
Mar 29, 2015
2,073
4,044
AFL Club
Adelaide
Now that thats done, its so good to see Cunnington back after all hes been through. A player you can't help but admire even though hes not on your team.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

adelaidecrows

Brownlow Medallist
Jun 6, 2010
15,972
15,842
Wasleys
AFL Club
Adelaide
22 disposals, he will get the nomination.

I'd go so far as to suggest he should be the runner up. Daicos will win the rising star but Soligo is an outright gun. Gibcus will be around the mark as well. Soligo at 36 is the steal of the draft so far but the crows could get Taylor and he could be even better. Heard the Crows couldn't believe Taylor was available.
 

VictorianCrow85

Club Legend
Jul 22, 2016
2,923
4,253
AFL Club
Adelaide
I'd go so far as to suggest he should be the runner up. Daicos will win the rising star but Soligo is an outright gun. Gibcus will be around the mark as well. Soligo at 36 is the steal of the draft so far but the crows could get Taylor and he could be even better. Heard the Crows couldn't believe Taylor was available.
I think Geelongs DeKoning probably gets runner up.
 

ABAB

Brownlow Medallist
Apr 3, 2018
10,866
5,777
AFL Club
Adelaide
I'd go so far as to suggest he should be the runner up. Daicos will win the rising star but Soligo is an outright gun. Gibcus will be around the mark as well. Soligo at 36 is the steal of the draft so far but the crows could get Taylor and he could be even better. Heard the Crows couldn't believe Taylor was available.
Very bullish on Taylor, definitely potentially 2 A grade midfielders. Not quite elite like Martin, Petracca, Bont, Fyfe and Dangerfield in their prime but could reach the high of Neale who is A+.
 

ABAB

Brownlow Medallist
Apr 3, 2018
10,866
5,777
AFL Club
Adelaide
3rd highest for us but I still doubt he gets the nom.
EDIT:and 6th on the ground overall.
So a player who will finish top 3 in the R/S won't get a nomination.....

1660374382471.png
 

mtbkym

All Australian
Jun 5, 2016
618
998
South
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Norwood, Chelsea, Canucks, Cubbies
That’s not the rule, when a mark is taken there the closest you can go is the top of the goal square, you can’t go over. People need to bloody learn the rules.
Not paid in the last against the rules? How often do you hear “back to the nine”? Might technically be the rule, but its never paid without warning
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Dewy006

GODRA
Oct 20, 2007
3,449
8,003
Perf
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
New York Jets, Toronto Raptors
Not paid in the last against the rules? How often do you hear “back to the nine”? Might technically be the rule, but its never paid without warning

Once again, in the last the player was inside the goal square already when the mark was taken, that’s fine, just like in general play you will be given a chance to retreat to the top of the goal square. Fog was 3m outside the goal square when the North Player took the mark, the closest he’s allowed is the top of the square, he blatantly went 3m over. It’s not hard to understand the rule.
 

Punchy Bassett

Brownlow Medallist
Oct 1, 2003
16,384
14,855
Adelaide, Australia
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
NFC AUFC MUFC Socceroos
Ugghhhh, Learn the rule people, in general play if you go over they will let you go back to the mark, when a player takes a mark in the goal square you can’t intrude over the top of the goal square. That’s it, it’s an automatic 50
Except it wasn't in the goal square
 

Scorpus

Moderator
Apr 16, 2014
50,833
129,108
AFL Club
Adelaide
Once again, in the last the player was inside the goal square already when the mark was taken, that’s fine, just like in general play you will be given a chance to retreat to the top of the goal square. Fog was 3m outside the goal square when the North Player took the mark, the closest he’s allowed is the top of the square, he blatantly went 3m over. It’s not hard to understand the rule.

The issue is North did exactly the same thing twice and they never paid 50m against them
 

Dewy006

GODRA
Oct 20, 2007
3,449
8,003
Perf
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
New York Jets, Toronto Raptors
Except it wasn't in the goal square

The mark? * me, the top of the goal square line goes across the entire field to the pockets where it intersects with the boundary. You can’t cross that point when a player takes a mark or gets a free kick. That rule has been in place for a couple of years now. You think Tex and Fog would know.
 

BACCS

BigFooty Juggernaut
May 10, 2009
52,992
35,241
Adelaide Oval
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Gary Putland, Redbacks, Oz Cricket
Murph lucky he has a contract for next year.
Huh? 19 touches, goal, a few score assists and a couple of goal assists last week, to then go with 14 touches, 9 score involvements, 1 goal assist a goal today. I think Rankine takes his spot next year, but he’s possibly had the best 2 week patch of his career.
 

BACCS

BigFooty Juggernaut
May 10, 2009
52,992
35,241
Adelaide Oval
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Gary Putland, Redbacks, Oz Cricket
sometimes it really is just a matter of intensity and getting more from players. laird and schoenberg lifted after half time
North did similar in their first half against the Pies too, dominated clearances and kicked straight that day, but they tend to always fade in 2nd halves.
 

Remove this Banner Ad