agree they need to be there in the wings to help shape things. but maybe just a more subtle difference in the colour (maybe using the same blue as on the shield so not introducing a whole new shade?). I actually quite like the colour as is when used in they eye, just in the wings is where is doesn't quite gel right IMOThat middle part is a throwback to the club's 90s roots
Yeah I'm still not convinced on the state of those parts either, but they definitely needs to be there to give 'shape' to the wings.
Thanks for the feedback
could be the asymmetrical beak?Looking great but I think theres something not right with the position of the head? I cant quite put my finger on it but it looks a touch like a kookaburra, a bit stumpy.
Have tried to take your feedback on board with the update below. Thoughts? Personally I really like the beak now.could be the asymmetrical beak?
Wonder what its look like if the far left part of the beak was removed and only the inner part of that used but then matched on the right side (so was a full block symmetrical beak but just the slim section that's there). then maybe extending/adjusting the lighter blue highlights if needed to help define the head from the body
I think the changed accent blue looks a lot better IMO. More seamless and helps overall look more streamlined
I like it, especially the beak on the first one!
yeah I think that retains your design element well but looks a bit meaner. also simplifies it for resized versions.I like it, especially the beak on the first one!
Do away with the shield. Just have Adelaide under as a banner.