Given the SANFL themselves said they only wanted status quo - either the answer is no or the SANFL has been lying.
But I'd think knowing you can't upgrade your stadium, are carrying debt and dropping crowds status quo is a good thing - especially when you get to keep the land and sell as needed
But I'd think knowing you can't upgrade your stadium, are carrying debt and dropping crowds status quo is a good thing - especially when you get to keep the land and sell as needed
So to entice the impassable the Government and AFL said you will receive the same as your getting regardless of the projected increase in attendances. And your telling me they said that's exactly what they wanted. Maybe Status QUO on the existing numbers for the corresponding income if numbers where higher at AAMI they would have received greater income, that sounds more like status quo and sounds like what they got.

