Adelaide's decision to not trade Patrick Dangerfield in 2014 - was this a mistake?

Power Play

Club Legend
Joined
Oct 8, 2017
Posts
1,010
Likes
5,374
AFL Club
Richmond
Thread starter #1
It's well known that Melbourne offered picks 2 and 3 to Adelaide for Patrick Dangerfield in the 2014 trade period, only for Adelaide to reject the deal.

Everyone knew that Dangerfield was going home to Victoria, and when he left Adelaide in 2015, they received picks 9 and 28 along with Dean Gore, for Dangerfield and pick 50.

Melbourne ended up drafting Christian Petracca and Angus Brayshaw with their picks in 2014. Petracca looks like he'll be a star and Brayshaw looks promising.

Adelaide on the other hand ended up turning their picks from the Dangerfield deal into Wayne Milera and Troy Menzel. Milera looks flaky and has question marks over whether he'll make it, while Menzel and Gore have been delisted.

I know it's easy to say in hindsight, but it looks like Adelaide screwed up badly by not accepting Melbourne's offer of picks 2 and 3.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Run n Spread

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Posts
7,072
Likes
4,907
AFL Club
Collingwood
#2
Would of Danger gone to Melbourne? If so yeah in hindsight probably should've traded him. But they made finals, wanted to have a crack at a flag, needed their best 22 so figured may as well get a year out of him and try and convince him to stay.

Could argue those that did cut losses: Should GWS have traded Boyd? etc worked.
 

Luv_our_club

Premiership Player
Joined
Feb 14, 2017
Posts
4,817
Likes
8,190
AFL Club
Hawthorn
#6
That Danger was soon entering free agency makes the decision not to trade even more regrettable.

Not paying the price in 2016 for Gibbs would worry more more as a Crow supporter.

Adelaide's recruiters at the draft have been outstanding in recent times; so the wasted picks in the 2015 draft were bound to happen sometime.
 

skittlebrew

All Australian
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Posts
813
Likes
936
AFL Club
Adelaide
#7
Danger was only ever going to go to Geelong, save for somehow relocating Mogg's Creek, Danger never would have agreed to any other deal. Adelaide got way unders for him because of their hand was so weak for this reason.
Exactly. Got to love it how we didn't get 2 x first for him because 'Geelong needs the other 1st to give to Carlton for Henderson'. Like somehow it's our problem you're eyes are too big for your wallet. But of course we caved like chumps anyway.
Given what we receive for him essentially nothing (barring a drastic form turn around from Milera) I would have preferred we sent Danger to the Rookie draft and watch him rack it up in a bottom 4 side for a year.

2016 for Gibbs would worry more more as a Crow supporter.
We lost by what 40 points? Gibbs makes us a lot better but that's a bridge too far.
 

Ian Dunross

Premiership Player
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Posts
4,476
Likes
6,622
AFL Club
St Kilda
Other Teams
Glenelg Tigers
#8
That Danger was soon entering free agency makes the decision not to trade even more regrettable.

Not paying the price in 2016 for Gibbs would worry more more as a Crow supporter.

Adelaide's recruiters at the draft have been outstanding in recent times; so the wasted picks in the 2015 draft were bound to happen sometime.
We're writing off players from the 2015 2 seasons in now?
 

Hap Hapablap

I'm off to Nepal to become a mountain goat.
Joined
Jun 27, 2006
Posts
11,366
Likes
2,349
Location
Where the cows go bong.
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Lakers,Inter,Man U
#10
I know it's easy to say in hindsight, but it looks like Adelaide screwed up badly by not accepting Melbourne's offer of picks 2 and 3.
and that why they made the grand final last year, they screwed up so badly
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Anja_Nees

Premiership Player
Joined
Aug 14, 2001
Posts
4,110
Likes
4,335
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
#12
Petracca would have been the perfect replacement for Dangerfield, and he's the exact type of player that Adelaide were lacking on grand final day.
A fully fit Petracca and Brayshaw could have helped but the reality is they are both still developing and Adelaide were terrible on the day.

All things considered they did ok out of the trade when you consider what they might have been given under free agency.
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Posts
17,647
Likes
13,504
AFL Club
Melbourne
#15
I don't recall it being well known we offered 2 and 3 for Dangerfield anyway. Would have been a good deal for us but BigFooty rumour at best.
Yes I agree. I don’t think that actually was legitimate. Paul Roos would’ve been pretty keen to use the picks. In hindsight, it wouldn’t have been a good deal for us.

If the deal was on the cards then Adelaide should’ve done it, but Dangerfield was always wanting Geelong so I don’t know it would’ve eventuated.
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2016
Posts
1,396
Likes
2,504
AFL Club
Melbourne
#16
Doesn’t tally with what Roos would have done. His list management centred on building a core young spine through the draft and getting games into them before handing a strong list over to Goodwin. The only players he traded in were Daniel Cross (DFA and one of the best pickups the club made in the past decade for his cultural and sports science work), Bernie Vince (upgrade on DH Sylvia) and Heritier. None of them were marquee signings but proven players brought in to fill positional and cultural holes in the list. We went deep in the draft and unearthed some excellent and promising young players further down the draft in Omac, Alex Neal Bullen and Jayden Hunt. I think the Dangerfield thing was a farrago from the get go.
 

Roovolution

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Posts
6,770
Likes
9,393
AFL Club
Adelaide
#17
I don't recall it being well known we offered 2 and 3 for Dangerfield anyway. Would have been a good deal for us but BigFooty rumour at best.
It wasn’t well known and I’m bloody sure it didn’t happen. Danger let the club know months in advance he wanted to go home and play for Geelong (his childhood team). The club didn’t want another drawn out issue like with Tippett and were always grateful for years of hard work Danger put in. The club and Geelong organised Danger’s move to Geelong months before the trade period.

We were always going to get steak knives for him as the free agency system is stuffed. Both clubs wanted the deal done early as we both had other trades to do and we got what we could for him. Should’ve we been a bit smarter with what we were asking? Probably.

But this BS that Danger was ever going to go anywhere but Geelong is a troll by the OP who not surprisingly is a Richmond supporter.
 

Roovolution

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Posts
6,770
Likes
9,393
AFL Club
Adelaide
#19
It's well known that Melbourne offered picks 2 and 3 to Adelaide for Patrick Dangerfield in the 2014 trade period, only for Adelaide to reject the deal.

Everyone knew that Dangerfield was going home to Victoria, and when he left Adelaide in 2015, they received picks 9 and 28 along with Dean Gore, for Dangerfield and pick 50.

Melbourne ended up drafting Christian Petracca and Angus Brayshaw with their picks in 2014. Petracca looks like he'll be a star and Brayshaw looks promising.

Adelaide on the other hand ended up turning their picks from the Dangerfield deal into Wayne Milera and Troy Menzel. Milera looks flaky and has question marks over whether he'll make it, while Menzel and Gore have been delisted.

I know it's easy to say in hindsight, but it looks like Adelaide screwed up badly by not accepting Melbourne's offer of picks 2 and 3.
I suspected Richmond supporters were clueless and now you’ve just confirmed it beyond a shadow of a doubt for me.
 

Topkent

Premium Platinum
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Posts
29,140
Likes
34,917
Location
Canada
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Winnipeg Jets
#20
Not going to comment on a specific deal but I think teams will start to follow the rest of the world and start trading their players 12 months from contract end if they get worried they won't sign so that they can maximize value.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Posts
1,217
Likes
4,318
Location
Canberra
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Everton
#22
I suspected Richmond supporters were clueless and now you’ve just confirmed it beyond a shadow of a doubt for me.
Gee whiz mate, you might need to get that chip on your shoulder checked out.

I'm a Richmond supporter and I am happy to leave this here:

Danger was only ever going to go to Geelong, save for somehow relocating Mogg's Creek, Danger never would have agreed to any other deal. Adelaide got way unders for him because of their hand was so weak for this reason.
 
Top Bottom