Remove this Banner Ad

Adrian Dodoro

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ok, Saints should trade us pick 10-18... oh wait.

Well, if they can get pick 13 that would be fair.

But will the Santo Cilauro comedy creation that is your list manager take it?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Also think Carlisle + 24 is a good deal for pick 5.

Nah. I think that - and I think this is reflected in the AFL weighting - that picks gain value exponentially the higher you get.

Pick five is pretty much gold standard. Pick 24 isn't worth THAT much.

The idea of the Saints trading 5 for 9 and 13 values 5 about right.

9 would be slightly overs for Carlise IMO but if the Saints paid it because they need him, then it isn't a rip off.

13 would be about right. You have to recall just how crappy Carlisle was at the end of the year and his pretty shitty onfield temperament.
 
Nah. I think that - and I think this is reflected in the AFL weighting - that picks gain value exponentially the higher you get.

Pick five is pretty much gold standard. Pick 24 isn't worth THAT much.

The idea of the Saints trading 5 for 9 and 13 values 5 about right.

9 would be slightly overs for Carlise IMO but if the Saints paid it because they need him, then it isn't a rip off.

13 would be about right. You have to recall just how crappy Carlisle was at the end of the year and his pretty shitty onfield temperament.

I would do pick 13.
 
I would do pick 13.
Every Essendon fan would do 13.

We'll either get 5 and have to give up more than Carlisle OR the Saints will break 5 down and we'll get one of the pieces.

Meanwhile Saints fans will circle jerk over how their club got one over the delusional Dons fans despite all reasonable Essendon fans predicting it.
 
Also I forgive his temprament.

Being an Essendon player the last few years, the odd outburst isn't a big deal.

I dunno. Once, yeah sure, but a few times, and the way he did. Hmmmm.
 
Yet they've increase each year for the last 3 years..
Stkilda bragging about corporate sponsorship is hilarious..
Enjoy playing in gay pride round..
Is there something wrong with recognising gender diversity in our community?
Maybe you feel there is something wrong with gay people in general?
 
You could only beat that North team when it was past its best. Couldn't get close to us in 98 when we were flying.

You've been in our shadow for 30 years now.

I love this.. The club run that almost relocated to the Gold Coast had other clubs in its shadow..
 
Every Essendon fan would do 13.

We'll either get 5 and have to give up more than Carlisle OR the Saints will break 5 down and we'll get one of the pieces.

Meanwhile Saints fans will circle jerk over how their club got one over the delusional Dons fans despite all reasonable Essendon fans predicting it.

I dunno about the fans, it is the sweat under the saddle on a racing camel that is Adrian Dodoro most opposition types s****** at.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I love this.. The club run that almost relocated to the Gold Coast had other clubs in its shadow..

Or, put another way, the club that never went anywhere that has only lost twice if memory serves (maybe three times, once you were cheating on drugs) since 2001 to yours.

Did you know Kevin Sheedy never beat a Dean Laidley coached side?
 
Every Essendon fan would do 13.

We'll either get 5 and have to give up more than Carlisle OR the Saints will break 5 down and we'll get one of the pieces.

Meanwhile Saints fans will circle jerk over how their club got one over the delusional Dons fans despite all reasonable Essendon fans predicting it.
Unfortunately for you, you get drowned out by the overwhelming majority of unreasonable Essendon who frequent these boards.
Good to hear you are realistic about what Essendon are likely to return for Carlisle. :thumbsu:
 
Nah. I think that - and I think this is reflected in the AFL weighting - that picks gain value exponentially the higher you get.

Pick five is pretty much gold standard. Pick 24 isn't worth THAT much.

The idea of the Saints trading 5 for 9 and 13 values 5 about right.

9 would be slightly overs for Carlise IMO but if the Saints paid it because they need him, then it isn't a rip off.

13 would be about right. You have to recall just how crappy Carlisle was at the end of the year and his pretty shitty onfield temperament.

Who was the last middle of the road KPD to go for a first found pick? They don't move too often. Hawthorn lost Croad and McPharlin for pick 1 and it is widely accepted that Freo paid massive overs. Paddy Ryder is a better player than Carlisle and was contracted and he went for 17 and 37.

5 for Carlisle o_O:drunk: Even 13 for Carlisle :confused:
 
Unfortunately for you, you get drowned out by the overwhelming majority of unreasonable Essendon who frequent these boards.
Good to hear you are realistic about what Essendon are likely to return for Carlisle. :thumbsu:
I'd argue that there is a lot more reasonable fans at the moment then Saints fans who seem staggered that we want more than 2nd round + Ross.
 
Or, put another way, the club that never went anywhere that has only lost twice if memory serves (maybe three times, once you were cheating on drugs) since 2001 to yours.

Did you know Kevin Sheedy never beat a Dean Laidley coached side?

Definitely makes Laidley a better coach than Sheeds in that case..
North are the smallest, weakest club in the AFL - to say that anyone has been living in their shadow for 30 years is laughable..
Next..
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Definitely makes Laidley a better coach than Sheeds in that case..
North are the smallest, weakest club in the AFL - to say that anyone has been living in their shadow for 30 years is laughable..
Next..

We're not the smallest by any measure, we are onfield one of the strongest, and in the last 30 years we've been a lot more successful than the vast majority of clubs.

Yours however is ... you know what yours is right now don't you?

This thread is about one of your brightest prospects in an otherwise very vanilla list leaving because, in Jake Carlisle's own words "THIS CLUB IS F***ED!!!!!!"
 
Definitely makes Laidley a better coach than Sheeds in that case..
North are the smallest, weakest club in the AFL - to say that anyone has been living in their shadow for 30 years is laughable..
Next..

North are neither the smallest nor weakest club in the AFL.
 
Who was the last middle of the road KPD to go for a first found pick? They don't move too often. Hawthorn lost Croad and McPharlin for pick 1 and it is widely accepted that Freo paid massive overs. Paddy Ryder is a better player than Carlisle and was contracted and he went for 17 and 37.

5 for Carlisle o_O:drunk: Even 13 for Carlisle :confused:

I made this point on the Essendon board as well. Ryder is 4 years older than Carlisle. Now obviously only 3 years at the time of trading. It still makes a significant difference in terms of value. That's 3 seasons worth of extra games in his prime. There is no doubt Carlisle is worth more than Ryder was. Although for the record Dodoro was saying in one of his media interviews that Port acknowledged Ryder was worth more than what we got but they simply couldn't come up with a reasonable better offer. Dodoro actually expressed a lot of respect for the effort that the Port list manager went to in order to secure the best deal possible saying "they did everything they could reasonably do" or something to that effect.
 
Nah. I think that - and I think this is reflected in the AFL weighting - that picks gain value exponentially the higher you get.

Pick five is pretty much gold standard. Pick 24 isn't worth THAT much.

The idea of the Saints trading 5 for 9 and 13 values 5 about right.

9 would be slightly overs for Carlise IMO but if the Saints paid it because they need him, then it isn't a rip off.

13 would be about right. You have to recall just how crappy Carlisle was at the end of the year and his pretty shitty onfield temperament.
See that's the thing, if you say "his temperament brings down his value" then you have to rate potential just as highly. And he has potential.
For the record I think 9 or 13 would be about right.
 
See that's the thing, if you say "his temperament brings down his value" then you have to rate potential just as highly. And he has potential.
For the record I think 9 or 13 would be about right.

Yeah nah. Temperament is proven , potential ain't.

On potential Harley Bennell is worth pick 1.

Nobody paying it but.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top