Remove this Banner Ad

Game Day AFC DRAFT DAY THREAD

  • Thread starter Thread starter dogs105
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

How many additional 2021 picks will we end up with from draft day trades?


  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Yeah because there has never been a rookie that has made it, stupid comment
+1

Dumbest comment of the night.

Wasnt Laird and Cameron from the rookie draft?
 
Just a few interesting talking points, does anyone think that Dodoro was trying to play funny buggers with us and trying to put pressure on us with their first 3 first rounders? The ''leak'' of Cox, Perkins and then Cook on the whiteboard... They instead take Reid with the last of their 1st rounds instead of Cook. I bet Dodoro was banking on us being keen on Cook (or another clubs in that 10-20 range) and trying to get us to trade up our pick 9 and an extra 2021 pick for him. Seems like we were more keen on Pedlar instead but he wasn't far off the mark; I wonder, if Pedlar was off the table at 9, would we have taken Cook? I reckon the mooted Collingwood or GWS trades for the pair of first rounders for our 9 + 22/23 were to try and get Pedlar + Cook anyway, so seems like we have gotten who we targeted. We must've gotten wind that Pedlar would've been gone by the GWS or Collingwood picks - if we did those trades.

I also think we were potentially trying to play Collingwood into trading up for pick 9 with leaking that we were interested in McInnes.
I hread McInnes being interviewed and he said that we were really interested in him at pick 9. Sounds like that was a bluff to try and trade with the pies
 
Totally different to the following and his vids.

17. Sam Berry
Best position:
Inside midfield
Height, weight: 181cm, 82kg
Recruited from: Gippsland Power
Projected draft range: 20-40
Plays like: Dylan Shiel
September ranking: 19
Rationale: Exciting midfielder with an enviable combination of ball winning, clean skills and speed. Winning over 50% of the ball in contested situations, his probability of an AFL career is high. Berry's position on this draft board rises on review of 2019 performance and how consistently influential he was.
Strengths:
Contested ball winning, first possession winner at stoppages, tackling, aggression, kick placement out in front of targets to lead onto, dual sided kick, composure with ball in hand, distribution by hand, acceleration with ball in hand out of stoppages, line-breaking run, speed, endurance, leap, works hard both ways, strong mark, consistency, versatility to play midfield, defence or forward.
Weaknesses:
Outside accumulation, running patterns outside the contest.
Sam BERRY
DRAFT ANALYSIS
A consistent midfielder with great contested ball-win- ning abilities, defensive pressure and endurance.
IMPROVEMENTS
› On-field speed
› Kicking composure

well someone obviously hasn’t watched him.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

If he slips through to the rookie draft we can put him on the category B rookie list for free and will be on our list, same with Newchurch we're hoping they both slip through
They don't need to slip through the rookie draft. They're now Crows players.
 
fu** off idiot..

were they rejected?.. or the clubs just didnt have any main list spot left for them?... think about it.

did Baldwin get picked?.. would rather take a chance on him with a rookie spot than waste it on a 32 year old mookay.

my hatred of the whole mookay phenomenon is justified... its the biggest joke in the afl that he is still on a list.
I would have taken a chance in Baldwin. Kid was going to be a freak.
 
Quite happy with our draft

We needed a tall forward and midfielders, plus forward-leaning utilities of all sizes. That's what we ended up with.

Hately, Pedlar and Berry fill gaping holes in our inside midfield which needed all sorts of talent. We needed to avoid pure ball magnets and seemed to have chosen more dynamic, versatile players with burst acceleration and some ability to impact up forward

Cook looks a really neat player and we don't have many forwards of his type that are real quality. Rowe fills a need as well.

Last drafts have been used on tall defenders, half backs and outside players so overall we've taken a nice mix the last three years

Now it's up to us to develop those players into guns

I fully agree with those thoughts. We've definitely refreshed every sector with young talent in the past 3 years. I also like we've gone for three very aggressive mids as well which should suit what Nick's wants.

It's a solid base for a rebuild.
 
We should really just get 22 players to run into the same contest.

That's right- 22. Bench as well. It's uber critical that every player wins the hard ball all the time.

Run, spread, ball movement are for losers.
These midfielder can spread because they have the ability to accelerate, hence the point of difference between inside midfielder who doesn't have the ability to accelerate, you need to win the ball before you can run, spread and move the ball and like I said, carrying the ball will never travel quicker than kicking it.
 
Collingwood essentially traded their 2021 first rounder for picks 30 (Poulter), 31 (McMahon), 44 (McCreery) and 2x 2021 third rounders
And they'll still end up with a top 10 pick with getting Daicos as a F/S. They worked the system to hit the draft hard this year.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Given that 2/3 of the clubs passed - they were clearly rejected.

I know you hate Mackay, and would rather have an inanimate carbon rod than having him on the list. Guess what? None of the AFL clubs wanted Baldwin, or any of the other players you've named. They clearly don't agree with your extremely biased opinion.

*** and lay off with the abuse. It's not necessary.
So you’re not expecting any rookies to get picked up tomorrow?
 
Crows players taken from the rookie draft.

Article from 2016, obviously the players listed below have played more games.


2012
Rory Laird (selection No.5), career games: 76*

2013
Kyle Hartigan (selection No.14), career games: 51*

2014
Charlie Cameron (selection No.7), career games: 49*
Jake Kelly (selection No.40), career games: 10*

2015
Reilly O'Brien (selection No.9), career games: 2*

2016
Hugh Greenwood (selection No.48), career games: 0*
Alex Keath (selection No.58), career games: 0*
 
This.

There is gonna be a talented youngster miss out tonight available to rookie and we havent got a spot cause we gave it to a waste of space in mookay..

Its a complete and utter disgrace... it beggars belief that he is still tormenting the fu** out of us supporters.. whos dick is he sucking ffs..

Build a bridge mate, Jesus.

Act like an adult ffs, you’re embarrassing yourself


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

This.

There is gonna be a talented youngster miss out tonight available to rookie and we havent got a spot cause we gave it to a waste of space in mookay..

Its a complete and utter disgrace... it beggars belief that he is still tormenting the fu** out of us supporters.. whos dick is he sucking ffs..
Wow.
 
These midfielder can spread because they have the ability to accelerate, hence the point of difference between inside midfielder who doesn't have the ability to accelerate, you need to win the ball before you can run, spread and move the ball and like I said, carrying the ball will never travel quicker than kicking it.

No, that's far far too simplistic. The difference between outside and inside is more than just a vulgar pace metric.
 
Build a bridge mate, Jesus.

Act like an adult ffs, you’re embarrassing yourself


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
ooooh look, the mookay cheersquad has arrived... anyone that still defends having mookay on our list is embarrassing themselves.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom