We offered that, they wanted hurley. Hooker wanted to stay as well.Wasn't it Hooker + 19 for Caddy or something like that or is my memory worse than I think?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We offered that, they wanted hurley. Hooker wanted to stay as well.Wasn't it Hooker + 19 for Caddy or something like that or is my memory worse than I think?
You're right.Wasn't it Hooker + 19 for Caddy or something like that or is my memory worse than I think?
I'm just happy we managed to land pick 26 and draft young Parfitt. Bombers dodged a bullet for sure.The Bombers requested AFL mediation, then offered up their first-round selection - pick 19 - and one of several players, including defender Cale Hooker.
Entertaining game in the end when it looked like it could be a massive blow out.
Some promising signs from some of the young players under 20-30 games.
Will be some ugly and frustrating football this year but there is a base to build upon going forward.
care to trade Silvagni? He looks like a ripper!
4 more Giants reserves players?And when he's gone we'll have a nice chunk of change to bring in someone who fits the age demographic of what we're building.
4 more Giants reserves players?
If they're as good as Plowman and Marchbank that's fine by me4 more Giants reserves players?
If he wasn't good today, then I am willing to give him a couple of games. He wasn't very terrible while at Geelong so we'll see if he can at least get to the level that he was on at Geelong.Rance was terrible but Caddy was on another level of bad. Geelong have made out like bandits with that trade.
We're 53 years into our 5 year re-build...We're two years into a rebuild, this is all to be expected.
Is that what you were saying? Because what you said was Dusty is more deserving that Cotch. In 2012 Dusty got 5 Brownlow votes. Cotchin got got 12 votes in just the last 4 games of the season. So how does Dusty deserve it more?No s**t. All I'm saying is there were better players that year imo.
But good on Cotchin deserves the accolades he gets I'll just sleep easy at night knowing that the only thing he achieved in his career was a Brownlow that was given to him because of a corrupt court ruling.
No. Its been one game so his chance is up. He is trash, get rid of him.If he wasn't good today, then I am willing to give him a couple of games. He wasn't very terrible while at Geelong so we'll see if he can at least get to the level that he was on at Geelong.
If not, then oh well.
First time watching him? Seriously you could tell he had potential by the fact he went #3 in the draft.I thought Martin was a skinhead thug with no potential. But looks like he could become a great provided he's got his s**t together and isn't another cousins or Jarrah. He looks intelligent and not a timebomb as I assumed he was for years. The game seems to attract an awful lot of unstable people.
Lol yeah, I don't know why the trade is already being ruled off as a bad one. He was actually quite decent in the JLT games that he played - especially in the Adelaide one - and, if he had a bad game today, it was his first down game so far. Rance had a down game too for his standards today and it appeared both Riewoldt and Cotchin did too so I am more than happy to wait and see how he goes in the next couple of weeks first.No. Its been one game so his chance is up. He is trash, get rid of him.
This is his third club. He's never taken the step many have predicted him to.No. Its been one game so his chance is up. He is trash, get rid of him.
When you have a quarter of you list as ex Giants you'd hope a couple are ok...If they're as good as Plowman and Marchbank that's fine by me
So? We paid a second rounder for him. If he stays at the 20 touches, 1.2 goals a game he was last year then ill take it. Dont need him to be the best player in the comp.This is his third club. He's never taken the step many have predicted him to.
Looks highly unlikely that's going to change at Richmond.
No the guys we recruited left because they were playing on a ridiculously stacked team where games were scarce.So? We paid a second rounder for him. If he stays at the 20 touches, 1.2 goals a game he was last year then ill take it. Dont need him to be the best player in the comp.
Btw your team is almost entirely players from other clubs that are failing to take the next step.
Tigers players, fans and officials to sing the song 5 or 6 times and carry on like they just won the flag.
Some things never change.
Are you his mum?
Who the hell is 'Nank'?
Never heard of him for starters.
Has been a liability mostly.
When you have a quarter of you list as ex Giants you'd hope a couple are ok...
Yeh because they didn't take that step. Or else they would be in the team and push others out.No the guys we recruited left because they were playing on a ridiculously stacked team where games were scarce.
Plowman hasn't improved? Phillips hasn't?Yeh because they didn't take that step. Or else they would be in the team and push others out.
Proven by the fact that most don't improve even after getting to Carlton.