AFL 2017 - R6 - GWS Giants v Western Bulldogs: Friday 7:50 PM AEST UNSW Canberra Oval

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

FACT is if any team had the same injuries that we did
they wouldnt get any where near GWS

all you complain that you have 1-2 players out, come back when you have 7-8
 
The 5th was in the last 20 seconds, killed the game but we were going to lose anyway

Nah most of our board thought Boyd competed well, but Mumford's one of the best rucks in the game

Obviously Boyd won't kick many goals playing 90% ruck. We can't get Roughead back soon enough :'(

Expect more than competing well for a buck a year. Boyd looks hopeless at times, that set shot at the end...wow

Was an amazing game of footy, Dogs should have won. Moral victory considering the injuries. Umpiring was fine, wish they'd change the 50m rule though. Too harsh for running across the mark.
 
Expect more than competing well for a buck a year. Boyd looks hopeless at times, that set shot at the end...wow

Was an amazing game of footy, Dogs should have won. Moral victory considering the injuries. Umpiring was fine, wish they'd change the 50m rule though. Too harsh for running across the mark.

i dunno what the club is doing to help boyd. We seem we cant develop key forwards and looks like we are destroying him.
we have had years to draft and trade, but i dont understand why we havent got specialist forwards
 
Yes because free kick differential is a quantitative indicator by which we can judge umpiring fairness... are you really that stupid?
 
Moral victory considering the injuries.

You mean our captain Davis, vice captain Coniglio, Griffen, Delideo, Buntine and losing Reid during the game to a hamstring (and Ward, Mumford, Corr and Wilson all spending extended periods of time in the hands of the medicos)

Yep. Moral victory for the dogs when facing a team with those kinds of outs:rolleyes:

Both sides were down important players before the game. Both sides lost players during the game.
 
Yes because free kick differential is a quantitative indicator by which we can judge umpiring fairness... are you really that stupid?
Missing the throws and the constant high shots on Mummy (3 that i can remember seeing with 1 in the final 2 mins) says otherwise.

Being personal again? Cant dogs supporters not play the man?

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
All while you've beaten nobody & your club is turfing veterans more often than I'm having a hot dinner.

Pipe down you clown
Bulldogs supporters get hot dinners? Globalisation really working at increasing living standards among the underprivileged then.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Missing the throws and the constant high shots on Mummy (3 that i can remember seeing with 1 in the final 2 mins) says otherwise.

Being personal again? Cant dogs supporters not play the man?

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

How about you reply to my argument, instead of diversion: free kick differential was posed as a quantitative indicator to judge umpiring fairness. Do you really think that it is an accurate indicator, or are you really that stupid?

See I wasn't playing the man, my suggestion is that if you believe that it is a reliable indicator of fairness, then you are an idiot. So, answer the question.
 
How about you reply to my argument, instead of diversion: free kick differential was posed as a quantitative indicator to judge umpiring fairness. Do you really think that it is an accurate indicator, or are you really that stupid?

See I wasn't playing the man, my suggestion is that if you believe that it is a reliable indicator of fairness, then you are an idiot. So, answer the question.

Stop being so salty and discuss like an adult.

Have replied on this before. I do think the rub/bounce went the way of the dogs and has done for a while.

Deliberate or otherwise it isnt "fair" as such.


Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
I think the Doggies players would have left Sydney very confident about getting the Giants later in the year, in Sydney or Melbourne

I know I feel better about the Dogs chances this season now than I did before the game. No ruckman, woeful goal kicking, finished without Libba and still only lost by 2 points. Is very promising
 
Last edited:
Its good to see this rivalry heating up on and off the field.

Dogs are improved on last year due to their belief. Giants look great though have weaknesses (they can switch off). We now have a big 3 and it will go down to injuries and who can win finals in Melbourne for the flag.

No I am not including RFC in the 3!
 
All in all was disappointing to lose one we should have won but without a ruckman and a man down the entire last quarter GWS had the momentum when it mattered.


Put Morris, Boyd, Roughead, Dickson, Cloke in that team and we win, even if GWS got back the couple they were missing too
 
All in all was disappointing to lose one we should have won but without a ruckman and a man down the entire last quarter GWS had the momentum when it mattered.


Put Morris, Boyd, Roughead, Dickson, Cloke in that team and we win, even if GWS got back the couple they were missing too
You do realise we were missing a few players as well right?

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 
My apologies. Missed that line.

Still. Those were pretty big outs and we also had a few see the doc through the game for extended periods.

We both at full strength i still think we win.

Hopefully next time both squads are.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
Both teams at full strength would be an absolute cracking contest for sure.
 
FACT is if any team had the same injuries that we did
they wouldnt get any where near GWS

all you complain that you have 1-2 players out, come back when you have 7-8

Davis, Cognilio, Whitfield, Mzungu, Deledio, Buntine, Griffen (Himmleberg, Setterfield)

There's 9 with 7 top line names. All missing from the game last night.

So you were missing a few. Whoop-Di-Doo. So were we.
 
Come to check this thread and not surprised on the s**t that's talked

- umpires
- north and wce posters trying to give it to the doggie supporters
It would be incredibly difficult to get out of the habit of heaping scorn, contempt and ridicule at the Dogs - the perennial soft target for other fellow weaklings and unfortunates. Pity for these posters, they have been forever rendered impotent by our magnificent deeds in 2016, and their relieved chirping following last night's final result suggests that they have a real fear of this new world order potentially continuing in 2017. The white noise about umpiring/the week off before finals/no good teams in 2016 is the sound of a dying, rotted carcass clinging to the old world that they thought would never change and has been forever destroyed - it is also a beautiful sound for us Dogs supporters who endured endless amounts of scorn and ridicule prior to the 2016 GF.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top