Mate. Read what I said. Based on the frame they showed on the big screen and the ground, which is which they reviewed it off - it was touched. If you go one frame forward, that being the one that i took as a screenshot and posted in my previous comment - it’s a goal
The VAR did not use all the frames. He couldn’t overrule it if he’d gone one frame forward, as i had
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are you saying the video review was using different footage to what was being shown on telly? Because I saw that fram in the "roll". Hence my reaction when that farcical call was made