Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Justice.
Hahaha got reamed the whole game and finally get a couple of 50/50 calls at the end.
If it was not 15, I'll agree. That mark gets paid all day every day.I wouldn't say the last call against Cameron was 50/50 call, clearly a mark that is paid 99.9% of the time. Baffling call to say the least.
I agree with your former point.
You didn't hear it because you didn't WANT to hear it. Re-visit it in the sober light of day. It's pretty damn clear, the umpy says it at least twice. It was the dopey commentators that were hyping up the 'not 15m' nonsense.Lol at the anti Geelong rubbish in here.
2 free kicks on the siren but people in here try to justify it with previous calls or bad kicking. These justifications weren’t given to us despite the umpires giving Brisbane 10 shots on goal to our 1.
That wasn’t touched and even if it was called touched (which I didn’t hear)
You don’t even need to say not 15 if it’s touched. It’s just touched play on.
Not 15m though... wow.
HTB also, no attempt. Umpires get HTB wrong all the time. Like when Jordan Clark wasn’t rewarded v Brisbane.
Just because we got away with one in the Brisbane game at the end isn’t justice or Karma. Do Brisbane get the 4 points back? And Sydney owe how many premiership points now? The 4 v Essendon and the 4 tonight?
Also where’s the karma for Barry Hall playing in a GF when he didn’t deserve to?
Point is I hardly think Sydney should be getting ‘justice’ for anything, especially something on Brisbane’s behalf.
Pretty sure you can't call holding the ball after the siren guys. He did not have it anywhere near long enough to warrant that call.
Selwood was even tackling, just had his hand on him like the moron he is expecting the call to go his way. No wonder he can't win finals recently.
Spot onUmpy was clearly saying 'touched play on'
Then Darcy straw manned the not 15 thing
just got home, absolute limbs. the thing is if the cameron mark was paid (which it should have been, went well over 15m), he would've had to have kept a straight line in the run up of his kick otherwise it would've been called play-on after the siren went. so doubt he would've kicked it anyway with that considered. crazy finish
Reckon you're more chance kicking a goal with a drop punt than a snap in that situation.He would have been allowed to start at the fence and come in perpendicular to get the run up for a snap. Just not allowed to go past that straight line you talk about. So more difficult than normal and a good chance he misses it, but still able to get a snap away after the siren.
Just watched it again, umpire clearly says “touched, play on” as soon as the ball is kicked. Correct decision not to pay the mark.
Pretty sure Sydney won.
We can only beat, who we play against.
just watched it on my pc through the headset. Ump for sure says not 15. I don't think Cameron kicks it regardless.
How do you know this? I couldn't hear it from the audio and Darcy's groupie-like shouting screams.
It's like that dress colour illusion.I didn't watch the game and just watched the highlights (prior to coming into this thread). I heard 'touched, play on'.
just watched it on my pc through the headset. Ump for sure says not 15. I don't think Cameron kicks it regardless.
Watched it 5 times now, pretty much neutrals are stating that the umpire said 'not 15' - only Swans supporters saying he said it was touched.
Everyone's right, yayI just decided to do the same after reading your post. I now hear both. First it's "touched, play on" then "not 15".
Either way, it's play on.