Autopsy AFL 2022 Round 10 - Cats v Port Sat May 21st 1:45pm EST (GMHBA)

[philthy05]

Lol tackled to ground. No htb play on

 

[SA HAWK]

De Koning brothers both look like being stars.

 

[KevDawg]

Great goal from Jez but didn’t he move left on the mark?

 

[philthy05]

Port played s**t, but so did the cats who only won some momentum after the refs handed it to them time and time again until the cats realised the game was unloseable.

 

[The 747]

Port played s**t, but so did the cats who only won some momentum after the refs handed it to them time and time again until the cats realised the game was unloseable.

Awwww

 

[Antzzz]

27 scoring shot to 12 … port lucky it wasn’t 10 goal loss really

 

[Frappe]

Port played s**t, but so did the cats who only won some momentum after the refs handed it to them time and time again until the cats realised the game was unloseable.

LOL. Port were allowed to try and break tackles all day. We should have won by 10+ goals. Not a good sign for us sadly.

 

[Skeppersap]

Port played s**t, but so did the cats who only won some momentum after the refs handed it to them time and time again until the cats realised the game was unloseable.

haha.... listening to opinions on football from someone who calls the umpires refs??? not likely!

 

[STPer18]

Some sub-par umpiring kept Port around for a bit longer than they should've, but once they put the whistle away we took them apart. Scoreboard definitely flattered them, but you take those wins.

 

[philthy05]

Cats fans are deluded.

Years of watching Selwood and hawkins get celebrated for doing what others get penalised for has done something to them.

 

[STPer18]

Cats fans are deluded.

Years of watching Selwood and hawkins get celebrated for doing what others get penalised for has done something to them.

How about that Hawkins goal? Dobbed it from 65m on the boundary by my rough calculations.

 

[philthy05]

How about that Hawkins goal? Dobbed it from 65m on the boundary by my rough calculations.

View attachment 1405552

That was Cameron, that went off the mark and wasn’t called play on.

Trying to troll and not even being able to name your own players is pretty bad.

 

[STPer18]

That was Cameron, that went off the mark and wasn’t called play on.

Trying to troll and not even being able to name your own players is pretty bad.

Other pocket, Hawkins kicked a monster. Cameron's was great too though wasn't it?

 

[My Tilly]

Worst game of the year?

 

[Frappe]

Worst game of the year?

It wasn't especially memorable.

 

[Wojcinski]

Incredibly easy win, scoreboard and a bit of favourable umpiring flattered Port big time. Should have been 80+ points and thats with half our team out and the remaining players playing pretty poorly. Port is in a worse place now than they were when we completely broke their club in '07

 

[Generalissimo]

Other pocket, Hawkins kicked a monster. Cameron's was great too though wasn't it?

Hawkins especially. Wrong HFF for a right footer and into the breeze.

On SM-A715F using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Conan Troutman]

What ******* insane logic is this?

So you can reach well over the mark, hold a player, then knock the ball out of his hands and it’s ok … if the arm was there defending?

Lol, right, "the umpires are cheating campaigners" is better logic?

Whats so difficult to understand? Bews was standing on the mark, hand out in front near the ball. Bews was not moving his arms. Port guy lifts the ball into Bews arm, ball falls out of his hands. That's clearly not a 50. Umpire thought so too.

Yeah you can reach over the mark - there's not some invisible barrier from the top of your toes up, that a player's body part can't reach over. I don't recall ever seeing a penalty for reaching over the mark, while feet are firmly planted on the mark.

 

[philthy05]

Lol, right, "the umpires are cheating campaigners" is better logic?

Whats so difficult to understand? Bews was standing on the mark, hand out in front near the ball. Bews was not moving his arms. Port guy lifts the ball into Bews arm, ball falls out of his hands. That's clearly not a 50. Umpire thought so too.

Yeah you can reach over the mark - there's not some invisible barrier from the top of your toes up, that a player's body part can't reach over. I don't recall ever seeing a penalty for reaching over the mark, while feet are firmly planted on the mark.

He was moving his arm. He should have been pinged. It’s not even remotely a hard call to make. Stand over a player getting up, put your arm in and knock the ball out = 50m penalty.

 

[philthy05]

The buddy arc alive and well

 

[bungalow_bill]

This puts a real dent in Hinkleys's plan to win multiple flags

 

[STPer18]

 

[Ricky Vaughn]

The buddy arc alive and well

Thank you for posting this.

 

[philthy05]

Thank you for posting this.

Great kick, but obviously should have been called play on.

As I said in the post, buddy arc is well and truly alive.

It’s now the Cameron arc.

 

[Ricky Vaughn]

Great kick, but obviously should have been called play on.

As I said in the post, buddy arc is well and truly alive.

It’s now the Cameron arc.

We can only hope the “Cameron arc” catches on. I have a feeling it won’t, but who knows.