- Sep 25, 2012
- 2,206
- 3,223
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Arsenal, Miami Heat
no chance.Probably game of the season.
I went as a neutral. that first half was utter trash. dont let the finish cloud your judgement. it was also riddled with mistakes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
no chance.Probably game of the season.
Why the 10+ posts specifically about Viney over the last few months?Dees would be concerned about Viney's form which has fallen off a cliff. Not good going into a big finals campaign.
Well it's not the reason you gave up two very late goals to blow a game you had in the bag3/5 of the Blues' starting midfield was missing. You saying that doesn't have an impact on the team's performance?
Who used it as an excuse. You are just making crap up. Mentioning something does not mean it was the reason we lost the game,Well it's not the reason you gave up two very late goals to blow a game you had in the bag
Been hearing these excuses for months now, it's not healthy
26 possessionsDees would be concerned about Viney's form which has fallen off a cliff. Not good going into a big finals campaign.
Why the 10+ posts specifically about Viney over the last few months?
I'd be more concerned about how many times he was allowed to blatantly drop the ball after taking on the tacklerDees would be concerned about Viney's form which has fallen off a cliff. Not good going into a big finals campaign.
Umpiring? Sounds like another excuseI'd be more concerned about how many times he was allowed to blatantly drop the ball after taking on the tackler
Clearly you aren't reading what I'm writing - mentioning something does not mean it is the reason you lost or is an excuse for the loss. Let me know if you would prefer it in a different languageUmpiring? Sounds like another excuse
All good practice for next week I suppose
Yeah sure, say "Melksham out-marked 3 of our defenders in the goal square" in FrenchClearly you aren't reading what I'm writing - mentioning something does not mean it is the reason you lost or is an excuse for the loss. Let me know if you would prefer it in a different language
definite grounds for a legal enquiry...Royal Commission?There has been no top 8 team that has had an inj run anywhere close to what Carlton has copped. Double digits on the injury list all year - started with the defence/forward and is now hitting the midfield.
No need to change the subject it's fineYeah sure, say "Melksham out-marked 3 of our defenders in the goal square" in French
No just a statement of factdefinite grounds for a legal enquiry...Royal Commission?
Why would Dees be concerned about what you’re talking about?Clearly you aren't reading what I'm writing - mentioning something does not mean it is the reason you lost or is an excuse for the loss. Let me know if you would prefer it in a different language
What I am saying is not directed to the Dees - really has nothing to do with them. My point was highlighting something about any facet of the game does not mean it is now automatically an excuse for the resultWhy would Dees be concerned about what you’re talking about?
no chance.
I went as a neutral. that first half was utter trash. dont let the finish cloud your judgement. it was also riddled with mistakes.
You responded to a “Dees would be concerned” with a “I’d be more concerned with” in relation to Jack Viney. How is it not directed to the Dees?What I am saying is not directed to the Dees - really has nothing to do with them. My point was highlighting something about any facet of the game does not mean it is now automatically an excuse for the result
I was making a comment about the umpiring in the game. Clearly directed at the umpiresYou responded to a “Dees would be concerned” with a “I’d be more concerned with” in relation to Jack Viney. How is it not directed to the Dees?
You responded to a comment about what the Dees should he concerned about.I was making a comment about the umpiring in the game. Clearly directed at the umpires