- Apr 27, 2014
- 6,350
- 9,583
- AFL Club
- Richmond
junk product
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Didn’t see it. Only switched on at last quarter. It was dissent but so harsh. So what’s next…..players won’t be able to celebrate goals in case it hurts their opponents feelings?Think it was 2nd qtr and there was a pathetic dissent free-kick. The game was ruined then.
All hope was lost when it was paid against Khamis.
You flogThink it was 2nd qtr and there was a pathetic dissent free-kick. The game was ruined then.
All hope was lost when it was paid against Khamis.
None , but Collingwood, Elliot Grundy pendles, Roughead, Kruger, just sayingHow many did Dogs have out?
English, Bruce, Hunter, JJ, O’Brien, Hannan, VDM would all be in our best 22.How many did Dogs have out?
Maybe they can introduce participation medalsCan't stand how every game now has some medal
Think it's Dogs fans saying 'BUUUKUUU'What was the go with booing Khamis
How many did Dogs have out?
Because I don't think umpires should automatically be abused?Yeah great argument, got me in a technicality. Are you an ump, or Brad Scott ? Must be one or other..
I just don’t understand how it’s meant to curb umpire abuse? Wouldn’t this be turning people against umpires more, creating more abuse?Think it was 2nd qtr and there was a pathetic dissent free-kick. The game was ruined then.
All hope was lost when it was paid against Khamis.
Maclean and WeightmanEnglish, Bruce, Hunter, JJ, O’Brien, Hannan, VDM would all be in our best 22.
I just don’t understand how it’s meant to curb umpire abuse? Wouldn’t this be turning people against umpires more, creating more abuse?
Just shows how out of touch and/or stubborn the AFL is. They wouldn’t dare backtrack now, even if it means an umpire (wrongly) cops a king hit at local level.It’s been a problem at local level too.