- Sep 3, 2019
- 17,241
- 49,911
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
. LegendYes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
. LegendYes.
Again, Neutrals also quite vehemently on Coll’s side, re umpires in the Geel games.Blamed the umpires in the Gellong loss and also the Sydney game. Clearly they weren't watching the same game as everyone else.
You keep digging a bigger and bigger hole.Claims all the neutrals sided with Collingwood. Couldn’t point out said neutrals when asked. Blames other poster instead of taking the L.
Who’s the fool? I reckon all the neutrals know.
Amen. Gameday threads for every club are the most cringeworthy s**t knownDo people ever get tired of just blaming the umpires after every game. At least put up some calls you thought were wrong and have a discussion about them. But nope it's just umpire this, umpire that. Pretty sure Collingwood got 2 goals from blocking free kicks, I've seen those be let go before, so you get some, you lose some.
I like a good bit of umpiring discussion, I'm a ******* nerd so I actually have read all the rules. But nowadays it's just bunch of nuffies blaming them for their lose. Pretty sure Stevic on the weekend king hit someone the way these people bang on about it.Amen. Gameday threads for every club are the most cringeworthy s**t known
I’m not wanting to open up another can of worms, as it doesn’t matter, and the Swans won, but to answer your questions, the two that stood out to me were obviously Papley’s push/non mark and the Howe block/shove off the marking contest.Do people ever get tired of just blaming the umpires after every game. At least put up some calls you thought were wrong and have a discussion about them. But nope it's just umpire this, umpire that. Pretty sure Collingwood got 2 goals from blocking free kicks, I've seen those be let go before, so you get some, you lose some.
Papley 100% Hands in the back. However, I feel as though the umpire may have simply believed Moore slipped over, as he was already on the down before the contact. The second one I can't really see well and now my coworkers are all looking at me as I have my head turned 1cm away from my monitor, but it looks like a bit of a dive by Howe.I’m not wanting to open up another can of worms, as it doesn’t matter, and the Swans won, but to answer your questions, the two that stood out to me were obviously Papley’s push/non mark and the Howe block/shove off the marking contest.
Sorry, they’re in a wonky angle.
View attachment 1512475
View attachment 1512476
I’m not wanting to open up another can of worms, as it doesn’t matter, and the Swans won, but to answer your questions, the two that stood out to me were obviously Papley’s push/non mark and the Howe block/shove off the marking contest.
Sorry, they’re in a wonky angle.
View attachment 1512475
View attachment 1512476
NoCan you show us the Daicos free and 50 and also the NON FREE to Buddy for front on contact in the first.
Nah, plus you’ve got NFICan you show us the Daicos free and 50 and also the NON FREE to Buddy for front on contact in the first.
Nah, plus you’ve got NFI
Don’t mind the free not being paid, but it wasn’t even a mark, so the double wammy then goal.Papley 100% Hands in the back. However, I feel as though the umpire may have simply believed Moore slipped over, as he was already on the down before the contact. The second one I can't really see well and now my coworkers are all looking at me as I have my head turned 1cm away from my monitor, but it looks like a bit of a dive by Howe.
Nah, plus you’ve got NFIYeah it’s against your narrative. The umpire gifted Collingwood a goal but you can't accept it.
All good man. I was in here arguing away that Ginnivan blocked Saad when we lost. Those 50/50 ones in tight games when it really matters do your head in. I really don't mind umpire discussion, but * me it's just so boring when it's people making fools of themselves thinking the umps are genuinely corrupt against them.Don’t mind the free not being paid, but it wasn’t even a mark, so the double wammy then goal.
Howes one is 50/50. Sometimes they pay em, sometimes they don’t but he was going up to punch and got blocked by the Swans player who wasn’t going for the mark/contest.
Lol sorry, I couldn’t figure out how to change the angle.
They’re only human, and they make mistakes. There would’ve been some Collingwood’s way which naturally I wouldn’t notice and vica versa. There’s definitely no grand conspiracy though - AFL isn’t smart enough to pull that offAll good man. I was in here arguing away that Ginnivan blocked Saad when we lost. Those 50/50 ones in tight games when it really matters do your head in. I really don't mind umpire discussion, but * me it's just so boring when it's people making fools of themselves thinking the umps are genuinely corrupt against them.
Don’t mind the free not being paid, but it wasn’t even a mark, so the double wammy then goal.
Howes one is 50/50. Sometimes they pay em, sometimes they don’t but he was going up to punch and got blocked by the Swans player who wasn’t going for the mark/contest.
Lol sorry, I couldn’t figure out how to change the angle.
Nah, plus you’ve got NFITo high from Quaynor.
Nah, plus you’ve got NFI
Vast majority of neutrals, thought that Papley should have been pinged for HITB.
So your view is clearly out of step.
Papleys was clearly an egregious error.Calls went both ways they let go a hundred incorrect disposals all night long (both sides too). Umpires didn’t have much of an impact in the end.
Papleys was clearly an egregious error.
That’s why it caused the most controversy.
The 50:50 calls, less so.
Papleys was clearly an egregious error.
That’s why it caused the most controversy.
The 50:50 calls, less so.
Nah, plus you’ve got NFIDaicos free and 50 was worse.