- Sep 14, 2005
- 18,420
- 18,667
Nah, because you’ve got NFIGot anything else.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah, because you’ve got NFIGot anything else.
Neutrals rightly saw the Papley one as the howler - no debate.Daicos free and 50 was worse.
Robbo even said it was a howler. The campaigner hates Collingwood with a passionNeutrals rightly saw the Papley one as the howler - no debate.
End of story!
HITB happened first - that’s the free always paid.It was high contact anyway was hardly some terrible error. Miochek got a very soft one just after anyway so let’s call it even for the howlers even if they were both technically there. I’d have rather both let go.
HITB happened first - that’s the free always paid.
Neutrals rightly saw the Papley one as the howler - no debate.
End of story!
My word you've got a hard on for 1 free in a game your team didnt play. Everything ok?Last quarter trying to look for an excuse.
Daicos got a very iffy free then a ridiculous 50 to goal.
Worst call of the day.
HahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaIm neutral and it was a bad call. Gifted Collingwood a goal.
I’m sticking with the ONE clear free that caused the outrage amongst neutrals and commentators.The Miochek one was just as soft. They paid both, so lets just call it even. They should have just paid neither and it would have been better. Wasn't the reason you lost, your first quarter was.
You’ve been cheering harder for the Swans then Sydney supporter, give us a spell champ.Im neutral and it was a bad call. Gifted Collingwood a goal.
You’ve been cheering harder for the Swans then Sydney supporter, give us a spell champ.
If you didn’t care so much, you would of stopped posting about a day ago.You will find I have no love for the Swans and there AFL handouts.
If you didn’t care so much, you would of stopped posting about a day ago.
The game involves my team, I’m not neutral, and we were beaten by the better team on the night as I was in the stands watching the game.Your posting
I’m sticking with the ONE clear free that caused the outrage amongst neutrals and commentators.
There’s no point in debating 50:50 frees, to which neutrals have shown indifference.
Neutrals rightly saw the Papley one as the howler - no debate.
End of story!
I’m sticking with the ONE clear free that caused the outrage amongst neutrals and commentators.
There’s no point in debating 50:50 frees, to which neutrals have shown indifference.
Have to say i thought there was only one team out there playing and it wasn't Sydney.The same commentators that almost were cheerleading for the Pies the whole night…
Have to say i thought there was only one team out there playing and it wasn't Sydney.
Terrible commentating.
One is pure conjecture - the other is verifiable interpretation of a passage of play.most neutrals said collingwood didn't belong in the prelim in the first place and their draw is a massive advantage year after year
Yep, most probs, got to wonder HTF they got within 1 point of Sydney though, maybe Sydney are getting to the end of their tether, doesn't bode well going into a GF.most neutrals said collingwood didn't belong in the prelim in the first place and their draw is a massive advantage year after year
Massive advantage? We've had to play you dickheads up there every year since 2013. * off with your bullshitmost neutrals said collingwood didn't belong in the prelim in the first place and their draw is a massive advantage year after year
Yep, most probs, got to wonder HTF they got within 1 point of Sydney though, maybe Sydney are getting to the end of their tether, doesn't bode well going into a GF.
Nah he's right, Sydney have never had an advantage since they had to leave Vic or fold.Massive advantage? We've had to play you dickheads up there every year since 2013. * off with your bullshit
Massive advantage? We've had to play you dickheads up there every year since 2013. * off with your bullshit