Autopsy AFL 2023 Round 8 - Cats v Crows Sat May 6th 2:10pm AEST (GMHBA)

[PhatBoy]

I notice the tampon factory hasn’t been moaning about the pretty blatant non-free kick against Atkins that led to Adelaide’s penultimate goal

 

[Tristan34]

LOL! Bews holding Keays when not in possession, "great play from Bews"

He dropped the ball.. Lol
Should of been HTB..

 

[PhatBoy]

He didn’t time use it fool

Yeah, he did. He tried to improve his angle.

 

[adammania9]

It is if you’ve had any opportunity to get rid of it. It’s incorrect disposal or holding the ball. Take your pick.

You are incorrect, and you are the only person who thinks it wasn’t a shcoker. The ball was knocked out in the tackle, and he did not have prior.

 

[The 747]

Good contest, Crows kept coming all day and had a few chances in the last.

I think we are in the top 4 now?

 

[PhatBoy]

Crows win free kick count interstate in a game in which they lose the disposal and tackle count but no it was the umpiring bias that beat them.

 

[Tristan34]

Lol no prior, Geelong fans simply don’t understand rules

He took the man on lol

 

[PhatBoy]

You are incorrect, and you are the only person who thinks it wasn’t a shcoker. The ball was knocked out in the tackle, and he did not have prior.

It wasn’t a shocker.
*en deal with it

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

what about placing the ball on the ground whilst being tackled? what are your views

Depends if it was deliberate or knocjered free

What do you think about Stewart laying on top of Pedlar and allowing to get up?
Obvious 50 not paid that cost adelaide a goal.

What about the front on contact by Cameron ?

 

[Mister B]

be good if they stop making interstate sides play at this dump

Well if it holds 40,000+ once reconstruction is done, there is no reason why all game shouldn't be played down there. Baffles me though with all the government money they have been given over the years that it will still only hold 40,000.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

He took the man on lol

How ? Lol
He picked it up while fumbling it then it knocked out in the tackle.

How did he take the tackler on when he from behind?

Are you for real? That’s idiotic

 

[citizen-erased]

How is taking possession, having time to use it, and being tackled and coughing up possession, not a free kick

If its knocked out its play on. Has been for a while.
Thems the rules as the afl sets out.
Keays htb was not there
Bews hold was.

 

[PhatBoy]

Depends if it was deliberate or knocjered free

What do you think about Stewart laying on top of Pedlar and allowing to get up?
Obvious 50 not paid that cost adelaide a goal.

What about the front on contact by Cameron ?

The clear mark to Hawkins 40 out straight in front not awarded? The free against Atkins that led to Adelaide’s second last goal when he literally grabs the ball and gets tackled instantly? There were heaps of 50-50 calls both ways.

It f**king happens, for f**ks sake deal with it

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

It wasn’t a shocker.
*en deal with it

Lol every neutral replying disagrees

 

[PhatBoy]

Nuffie

Everyone else is wrong. You’re the only one that’s right, yeah?

Yes. When people come into a thread specifically to post about a decision because they’re getting period pain over it, it isn’t ‘everyone.’ It is everyone that wants to piss and moan.

 

[Shaunbkk]

this ridiculous version of the once great game JUST MAKE EVERYBODY WHO GETS THE BALL HOLDING THE FECKING BALL why dont you HTB HT is that all that it is now f me dead

 

[Redline]

Good contest, Crows kept coming all day and had a few chances in the last.

I think we are in the top 4 now?

Cats too good. Building nicely

 

[PhatBoy]

Lol every neutral replying disagrees

I very neutral disagrees because they entered the thread BECAUSE they disagree.

They’re literally in the thread FOR THAT REASON.

 

[Hoops]

Depends if it was deliberate or knocjered free

What do you think about Stewart laying on top of Pedlar and allowing to get up?
Obvious 50 not paid that cost adelaide a goal.

What about the front on contact by Cameron ?

Another free that wasnt there in the first place. Geelong tackle, "high" same thing by crows, "play on"
"

 

[Jimmy Yamazaki]

Happy to get the win, not happy with all the injuries though.

 

[adammania9]

Yes. When people come into a thread specifically to post about a decision because they’re getting period pain over it, it isn’t ‘everyone.’ It is everyone that wants to piss and moan.

Thanks Confucius. Enjoy being a nuffie

 

[The King!]

Well if it holds 40,000+ once reconstruction is done, there is no reason why all game shouldn't be played down there. Baffles me though with all the government money they have been given over the years that it will still only hold 40,000.

yeah but it's half a construction site now and yeah fine play everyone there then, thats fine,

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

The clear mark to Hawkins 40 out straight in front not awarded? The free against Atkins that led to Adelaide’s second last goal when he literally grabs the ball and gets tackled instantly? There were heaps of 50-50 calls both ways.

It f**king happens, for f**ks sake deal with it

Don’t hawk held it long enough and if he did then they should have paid the non mark to Tex in the last. They were about equal

 

[Magma]

Yes. When people come into a thread specifically to post about a decision because they’re getting period pain over it, it isn’t ‘everyone.’ It is everyone that wants to piss and moan.

what is it with you and periods? bit odd

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Crows win free kick count interstate in a game in which they lose the disposal and tackle count but no it was the umpiring bias that beat them.

Only morons rely on the free kick count to win an argument