You can say the same thing about the best players for every team.Well they can’t afford a dip with any of those key players.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Hawthorn v Adelaide - Rd 11 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Hawks at 66% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 11 Games
Soccer Notice Image
Champions League - FINAL - PSG v Arsenal ⚽ Europa Semis ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - SEMIS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ FA Cup - Man City Win
You can say the same thing about the best players for every team.Well they can’t afford a dip with any of those key players.
Actually - you are implying we have no improvement left which is fanciful.McStay Long are just not much good
Yes sorry Elliot was beaten and Crisp was ok but is in decline.
The crux is the best players all played extremely well.
Given the neutrals here have all said Coll got a bad wrap from the Umps - your comment is largely irrelevant.Just watched the replay umpire still missed the unmissable free against Maynard.
Lmao there wasnt a single instance where Shultz was ducking he’s just a midgetYeah I noticed the umpire 3-4 times the non HTB on Maynard in StKilda goal square
The free to Cameron who goaled
The constant to highs the ducking Shultz
The non advantages to NWM when he was going for goal
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You probs need to go to spec savers mate.How did Diacos go tonight? From the eye test he was there but not very damaging.
Lmao there wasnt a single instance where Shultz was ducking he’s just a midget
Similar to Saint Kildas first 2 goals then. One payed for an impossible to get out of unfair situation which resulted in a 50 and a goal and the second an instant follow up after said goal.Ridiculous comment given the most obvious holding the ball in history wasn't paid in the goalsquare, which would've resulted in a 1 point margin.
And shortly after Collingwood got the only remaining goal of the game.
Similar to Saint Kildas first 2 goals then. One payed for an impossible to get out of unfair situation which resulted in a 50 and a goal and the second an instant follow up after said goal.
Nope. The same rule wasn't applied to St Kilda in the second half despite 2 similar instances. Schultz was instantly pinged after the mark and had no chance to leave the area after the mark. The umps realised they made a mistake and corrected the calls later in the game.You mean the two rules enforced correctly.
Shultz stood to the side and encroached the mark it’s 50
Not a free. Knocked out in tackle and appeared Maynard was claiming a mark, so ump has to factor that in.Just watched the replay umpire still missed the unmissable free against Maynard.
Nope. The same rule wasn't applied to St Kilda in the second half despite 2 similar instances. Schultz was instantly pinged after the mark and had no chance to leave the area after the mark. The umps realised they made a mistake and corrected the calls later in the game.
But I realise that there are swings and round abouts in games and that shit happens.
2 men stopped after the umpire said stand and got pinged 50.You mean where Shultz encroached the mark from the side. Shit rule clear 50
People dont have instant reactions. He stopped after the mark (whistle blow) like all humans are capable of. Put his hands up for the mark and was instantly pinged. The same happened twice later but no 50s were given.He took two steps in from the side wasn’t attempting to move
Not sure how you can say that tbh, 26 disposals 3 clearances and 5 goal assists with 81% DE is bonkers from only 55% time on ground…Pendles was decent but in the next rung. Pies won’t be expecting him to be Pendles of a decade ago. De Goey just annoys me so I struggle to give him votes- bloke could be anything but does nothing for half a game. He was decent thought Shultz was the better half forward anyway.
Daicos will get the 3 votes
Both were correct according to Adam, as they both went the Saints way.2 men stopped after the umpire said stand and got pinged 50.
Not 2 minutes later the same thing happened with the saints and one player was called out. So which decision was correct, should it have been a 50m penalty and subsequent goal to the pies too?
Why criticise Nick for Ross letting him run free to do whatever he pleases?Nick Daicos...41 possessions against St Kilda.....only 6 of them were contested possessions, 35 of them were uncontested possessions.
Pendles can only be said to be in the next rung because of his time played, his impact was second only to Nick Daicos.Pendles was decent but in the next rung. Pies won’t be expecting him to be Pendles of a decade ago. De Goey just annoys me so I struggle to give him votes- bloke could be anything but does nothing for half a game. He was decent thought Shultz was the better half forward anyway.
Daicos will get the 3 votes
For all the talk about missing Moore and Howe, Quanyor and the rest of your small/mid defenders did their job stopping our forwards and rebounding fast.When will the afl community start talking about Quaynor how they should, he is AA level every single year and certainly the past 3 years is rather have Quanyor than Tom Stewart for example.
He was unbeaten tonight and is an athlete unlike any other in the league.
When people write Collingwood off year after year it’s like they forget we have Quaynor, Maynard, Darcy Cameron, Josh Daicos, Jack Crisp, Steele Sidebottom, Pendlebury etc etc that are some of the best players in the comp and don’t even get a mention for why the pies will make finals.
Not sure how you can say that tbh, 26 disposals 3 clearances and 5 goal assists with 81% DE is bonkers from only 55% time on ground…
Pendles can only be said to be in the next rung because of his time played, his impact was second only to Nick Daicos.
Collingwood mid size defenders have been the best in the afl since 2018 and just never get a mention. No idea why.For all the talk about missing Moore and Howe, Quanyor and the rest of your small/mid defenders did their job stopping our forwards and rebounding fast.
You forgot Perryman, Houston, McReery, Schultz, DeGoey and Lipinski.When people write Collingwood off year after year it’s like they forget we have Quaynor, Maynard, Darcy Cameron, Josh Daicos, Jack Crisp, Steele Sidebottom, Pendlebury etc etc that are some of the best players in the comp and don’t even get a mention for why the pies will make finals.