- Joined
- Sep 9, 2015
- Posts
- 26,037
- Reaction score
- 26,708
- AFL Club
- Carlton
If you're fat I still accept you and your opinions on football.![]()
They can't be fat, they are headless, they can't eat.
Possibly quite skinny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

ADE v GEE · HAW v WB · NM v FRE · GCS v BL · WCE v PA · SYD v StK · ESS v CAR · COL v MEL ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
If you're fat I still accept you and your opinions on football.![]()
Rock on, Mr Meow!If you're fat I still accept you and your opinions on football.![]()
Oh - so you initially implied fat people were less knowledgeable about football because I, a registered user who just happened to stumble upon your post in a neutral thread, am "probably a fat **** who's never kicked a ball in [my] life and acts like [I know] football"?
That seems awfully convoluted and confusing, so I imagine I'm mistaken. What was the actual reason you drew on fatness in your original post, do you think? What societal structures enabled that remark?
Absolutely, the first four games could hardly have been a softer fixture. Still, winning three of those is better than winning one of them which might have been the case in prior years.True but north had a soft start to the year
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No, that seems quite evident. Could you please explain to me why fatness was relevant in your original post?No, you still don't get it.
no way Voss survives this week, dead man walking.
Laughter is never a waste.Carlton are officially a waste of space.
Good might be pushing the boat out. Fantastic result.
Irs hard to believe it would be fitness at AFL level. It has to be mental and, probably, coaching. Winning and losing are habits, which potentially makes this a big redsult for North after the West Coast game and almost throwing it away against Essendon.
It wasn't good football from either side most of the game, but winning from behind has to induce some belief into a team short on wins - and especially getting a few in a short period - for a long time.
"No, dig UP stupid!"
expecting a floggingYep a real a test
No, that seems quite evident. Could you please explain to me why fatness was relevant in your original post?
what a disgusting 2nd half by Mckercher. pathetic. no heart.
Weitering the difference.
I thought it was to talk shit about north?
It's not that deep bro relax, just go on Jenny Craig, play the game in person not on the Playstation like your kind like to do, and you'll gain experience on the game.Oh - so you initially implied fat people were less knowledgeable about football because I, a registered user who just happened to stumble upon your post in a neutral thread, am "probably a fat **** who's never kicked a ball in [my] life and acts like [I know] football"?
That seems awfully convoluted and confusing, so I imagine I'm mistaken. What was the actual reason you drew on fatness in your original post, do you think? What societal structures enabled that remark?
Graeme Wright paid off the umpires to loose? With entire board/player/cheer squad support no doubt.Sling tackles paid to north and not Carlton then in the last 30 seconds that led to a goal.
Darling grabbed the leg of a player and brought him down without the ball and no free in Carlton's defence.
Just either incompetence or deliberate.
Weitering the difference.
Great chat. I wonder if it's because you can't really explain it without reflecting on your internal biases, which can be uncomfortable.
