Autopsy AFL 2026 Round 5 - Crows v Blues Thurs April 9th 7:40pm AEST/7:10pm (AO)

[mick500]

The Crows dominance in the middle at the start of the second was built entirely on free kicks handing them clearances.

Rachele's throw in the second cost Carlton an easy shot on goal.

Finbarr's goal in the last for a ridiculously soft free that they ignored MacKay.

Soligo flopping for a non existent hold for the sealer.

The blatant deliberate for Murray.

Walker's throw for Rankine's last.

Quick, someone call the wambulance. I'd be crying if we lost to the eagles as well though tbf

 

[Blue Red and Gold]

Y

We shouldn’t have let Keays go

You're doing ok without him mate

 

[UltraEgo]

Arc should not be able to overturn unless its last qtr last 2 mins

that would be stupid

 

[Red_man2008]

Guess who gets the free kick in these decisions. lol. All night paid to Adelaide but not to Carlton. Look at the centre clearance holds that go paid and then not to Cripps in two separate instances seconds apart. The holding the ball calls on Walsh and CERRA and Cripps and hollands but never paid on Taylor Walker

13

Taylor Walker

Age

36

Ht

192cm

Wt

102kg

Pos.

Fwd

Career

Season

Last 5

D

13.0

3star

K

9.0

3star

HB

4.0

3star

M

5.7

5star

T

1.6

4star

G

2.3

5star

No current season stats available

D

8.0

2star

K

6.4

3star

HB

1.6

2star

M

4.2

4star

T

1.6

4star

G

1.6

5star

who on multiple occasions was caught dead.

 

[Red_man2008]

Guess who gets the free kick in these decisions. lol. All night paid to Adelaide but not to Carlton. Look at the centre clearance holds that go paid and then not to Cripps in two separate instances seconds apart. The holding the ball calls on Walsh and CERRA and Cripps and hollands but never paid on Taylor Walker who on multiple occasions was caught dead.

The stand call on Walker on Haynes which went unrewarded while his kick was called a free down the ground. lol.

 

[Red_man2008]

Nicks can never whinge about decisions in the media ever again. He just got a gluttony of back pay on the one night.

 

[Elixuh]

Y

You're doing ok without him mate

Do the right thing and give him back

 

[Blue Red and Gold]

Do the right thing and give him back

Straight swap for Charles?

 

[Chuckie357]

Um if you toe poke it for a goal you've done it deliberately.

If the ball touches your toe during a contest near the boundary line and it happens to roll over the boundary line it's a completely different scenario.

Why can't you get that?

You don’t get to pick and choose when the actual fundamentals of the game apply. Forever the ball has been bouncing into a players boot out on the full and a few kick was awarded.

All of these argumentative scenarios count as a kick, people are just cracking the sads now because the afl are reviewing it almost everytime which is wrong

 

[Bostonian]

You don’t get to pick and choose when the actual fundamentals of the game apply. Forever the ball has been bouncing into a players boot out on the full and a few kick was awarded.

Except this isn't out on the full. It's rolled out of bounds exactly as it does if it hits a player in the shoulder or arse.

All of these argumentative scenarios count as a kick, people are just cracking the sads now because the afl are reviewing it almost everytime which is wrong

People are calling it out for the utter load of shit that it is. Adds nothing to the game other than giving teams stupid advantages for a nothing action.

 

[Go the Guts]

That’s because we pear supporters know the rules.

Lol yeah, sure you do.

If you see this sort of analysis from a Carlton or Port supporter, please ignore and jump to the next post.

We already do. Especially posts from guys like old Mr. ‘2 posts’ here.

 

[Red_man2008]

You don’t get to pick and choose when the actual fundamentals of the game apply. Forever the ball has been bouncing into a players boot out on the full and a few kick was awarded.

All of these argumentative scenarios count as a kick, people are just cracking the sads now because the afl are reviewing it almost everytime which is wrong

May as well review throws too. And holds off the ball. Full VAR like the EPL for every goal.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Will Patrick Cripps

9

Patrick Cripps

Age

31

Ht

195cm

Wt

93kg

Pos.

Mid

Career

Season

Last 5

D

25.9

5star

K

9.8

4star

HB

16.1

5star

M

3.4

3star

T

5.8

5star

CL

7.4

5star

D

21.0

5star

K

10.1

4star

HB

10.9

5star

M

2.5

3star

T

3.8

4star

CL

6.3

5star

D

12.6

4star

K

4.8

2star

HB

7.8

5star

M

2.0

3star

T

3.2

5star

CL

1.4

4star

cop a week for trying to punch Peatling?

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Guess who gets the free kick in these decisions. lol. All night paid to Adelaide but not to Carlton. Look at the centre clearance holds that go paid and then not to Cripps in two separate instances seconds apart. The holding the ball calls on Walsh and CERRA and Cripps and hollands but never paid on Taylor Walker who on multiple occasions was caught dead.

If I had the time I could easily make a similar video where Carlton get a bunch of dodgy frees

Its
Doesn’t mean anything

 

[Grangeroad]

Lol yeah, sure you do.


We already do. Especially posts from guys like old Mr. ‘2 posts’ here.

Get used to me. Just joined up. Will try and teach crow supporters the rules of the game.

 

[Madas]

You know you are in trouble when the caller making the most sense in that situation was Riccuito. Notice how quickly the other commentators other than Riewoldt shut up after Riccuito coercion pointed out that the goal umpire was 100% in the right in that situation and explained why. The arc would have said the ball clearly crossed the line referring to the rushed point. As the goal umpire (correctly) allowed play to continue and the field umpire asked the goal umpire for his thoughts which was behind, the review needs to go all the way to the end of continuous play to either confirm or disprove the goal umpires thoughts.

The only issue here was that the commentators are incompetent and don't know what they're talking about and the field umpire didn't stay the f out of it. The ball clearly didn't cross the line from the initial kick (defender in line with the middle of the post at the time he made contact with the ball and ball went forward, ergo ball could not have crossed the line). The only decision that needed to be made was did the field umpire think the subsequent rushed behind warrant a free kick against Adelaide. Once that decision was no, there was no doubt the score was going to be a behind.

Correct on all counts

 

[Go the Guts]

Get used to me. Just joined up. Will try and teach crow supporters the rules of the game.

Flogging things up in your first few posts, but nice try.

 

[Cam Payne]

C7 commentators were flat out barracking for Carlton. Possibly the worst call I've heard in some time.