Heard of front on contact in a marking contest?I hadnt heard of that rule before. That you have to jump.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Heard of front on contact in a marking contest?I hadnt heard of that rule before. That you have to jump.
Gotta admit, I didn't understand the glaze the Doggies got this year. They finished outside the finals last year (albeit in a close ladder), but the footy public seemed so ready to endorse them as a top team, without seeing runs on the board. Defo a media darling. St Kilda in the same camp after spending like drunken sailors in the off season.
We all know Bont is amazing & Richards is a very very good footballer... but for mine... Darcy was anointed as the next big thing before he had done a lot. However the best 23 falls away pretty badly in terms of quality, which has been shown by the inability to cover these recent injuries. Losing Jamarra and Smith really stuffed the momentum they had a few years back.
I can't see them recovering to play a meaningful part this season.
Something something Hannebery not getting a free cost us the flag something something.The fact you even mentioned Naughton is pretty disingenuous considering the game was well and truly over by the time he got injured. His injury had nothing to do with the result.
So was Easton wood.We were first to the ball and got rewarded mate.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Incredible how a supporter base can make so many false statements.Melbourne media get sucked in by the Bulldogs every year.
Exhibit A Of the collective.Gotta admit, I didn't understand the glaze the Doggies got this year. They finished outside the finals last year (albeit in a close ladder), but the footy public seemed so ready to endorse them as a top team, without seeing runs on the board. Defo a media darling. St Kilda in the same camp after spending like drunken sailors in the off season.
We all know Bont is amazing & Richards is a very very good footballer... but for mine... Darcy was anointed as the next big thing before he had done a lot. However the best 23 falls away pretty badly in terms of quality, which has been shown by the inability to cover these recent injuries. Losing Jamarra and Smith really stuffed the momentum they had a few years back.
I can't see them recovering to play a meaningful part this season.
The swans player who looks like Heeney sprints back and makes front on contact and tunnels Naughton which is blatantly obvious to see. Unless I’m missing something (didn’t watch the game) the umpires did not pay Naughton a free kick. The AFL also won’t suspend the Sydney player despite his contact causing injury. Yet we copped the pushing a player in a marking contest suspension last year.
Going back with the flight and not contesting the ball but making contact is one of the most dangerous things on a footy field. The AFL need to wisen the **** up instead of spending all their time worrying about turning the sport into netball.
Probably pretty badly, but I like to think we wouldnt get blown away.Wonder how Hawthorn would go missing their entire spine. It's not just. "Some injuries".
Maybe people should not comment when they have absolutely no idea so they don't look so stupid
As much as I like Darce, he does need to put on some serious size. And maybe grow out a beard/mo.Darcy.
In terms of importance, Sydney can cover them for a period .... again, we have our entire spine out. We have no tall players left and Bont, Richards and Treloar at a minimum are clearly playing injured.
Can we get a few links to some examples from the preseason?I think you missed the point of my post.. That the Dogs were put up on a pedestal without actually doing much in the last 24 months. The point I was (trying to) make was that the media and the footy loving public for some reason had endorsed your team as the next riser
That’s fair …. Gws been dealing with it all year as wellLadies and gentlemen, every club has a Doggy, they are not us, we are not them.
Injuries have brought the club to have a similar age demographic to West Coast/Richmond/Essendon and we are playing like that. The players that we do have with experience are pretty hampered themselves and would likely not be playing if the toll wasn't as extreme as it is.
With that said, that's not a whinge, that's the reality of the situation, we'll be right.
We were the most suspended team in the league just last yearCertain teams are immune (cough cough cough) to suspensions!
I agree. Both teams at full strength would be a closer game, probably the swans by 65 pointsno one underestimates the value and effect of Heeney and Gulden. Their omissions are significant BUT Sydney has the depth to cover them. Again, they are a better team with both playing, but their absence does not expose the team.
Dogs, on the other hand, have copped injuries to all parts of the ground and those players are not as easily replaceable with available depth. Their backline depth was always a concern and is exposed by the absences; even more so against the height of Sydney’s KPF.
Key injuries expose depth and have a flow on effect to structure.
Both teams at full strength would have been a helluva lot more entertaining and closer.
Talking off the top of his head again. He sees the name Sydney and the keypad starts typing itself.We were the most suspended team in the league just last year